Teams

Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Halle

Spring USTA Central Indiana Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 7.0 Women, W

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-30vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCD DaltonLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Mouser / Sue Nonweiler vs Jennie Duffin / Mary Coyne4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAmanda Bates / Karen Halle vs Mary Beth Servie / Jackie Clark6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-16vs Indy A55 7.0W MRC VorheesLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Wilson / Ann Mouser vs Jini Morgan / Kristi Knapp6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Bates / Karen Halle vs Gayle Flannery / Amanda Rammel4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSue Nonweiler / Misty Brown vs Roberta Terranova / Carole Clohessy4-6, 1-6
2026-05-09vs Indy A55 7.0W IND AckermanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Bates / Karen Halle vs Cynthia Rathjen / Lori McPike6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSue Nonweiler / Kathy Collins vs Leyna Mulholland / Chahrzad Montrose6-7, 5-2, 1-0
2026-04-25vs Indy A55 7.0W CRC NelsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMisty Brown / Michelle Wilson vs Karen Fennerty / Melinda Brueggemann2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Negley / Cyndee McFerran vs Jennifer Crouter-Clouse / Julie Dunscomb1-6, 0-6
2026-04-18vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCD MelcherWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmanda Bates / Karen Halle vs Elizabeth Ball / Elizabeth Yu6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Negley / Sue Nonweiler vs Teresa Warr / Anne Gilbert6-3, 6-4
2026-04-11vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCD PruittLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Bates / Misty Brown vs Linda Burwell / Taeko Escasa1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Burns / Jacqueline Bartelt vs Vicki Valandra / Tamara Kafka2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Wilson / Cyndee McFerran vs Lisa Pruitt / Ally Hedrick3-6, 1-6
2026-03-28vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCD CookWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Burns / Jacqueline Bartelt vs Annette Kreider / Kay Taylor6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCyndee McFerran / Karen Halle vs Lori Schumacher / Brenda Evans6-1, 6-3
2026-03-21vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCE AkersLost 02
L#1 DoublesSue Nonweiler / Carol Negley vs Leigh Ann Price / Diane Turpen0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Wilson / Karen Halle vs Cynthia Heinbaugh / Carmen Cudiamat0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · CIN Indy 55 & Over 7.0 Women, W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Pruitt8020412149
2Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Dalton7118618179
3Indy A55 7.0W IRCE Akers53141020166
4Indy A55 7.0W CRC Nelson53141026209
5Indy A55 7.0W MRC Vorhees4415921176
6Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Halle35101429218
7Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Melcher3591533235
8Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Cook1732143279
9Indy A55 7.0W IND Ackerman0851939255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christy Hume
published 4
3.27
Karen Halle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.15
Ann Mouser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Cyndee McFerran
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Sue Nonweiler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Misty Brown
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Carol Negley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.76
Jacqueline Bartelt
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Julie Burns
published
Kathy Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Misty Brown + Sue Nonweiler10853% games−1.6% vs expected
Cyndee McFerran + Carol Negley7553% games−3.9% vs expected
Cyndee McFerran + Misty Brown7261% gamesnot enough data
Carol Negley + Kathy Collins6168% gamesnot enough data
Cyndee McFerran + Karen Halle4174% gamesnot enough data
Sue Nonweiler + Kathy Collins2351% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Bartelt + Sue Nonweiler404 matchesnot enough data
Carol Negley + Sue Nonweiler134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christy Hume
28W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Halle
70W–42L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
3.5
Ann Mouser
43W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Cyndee McFerran
106W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
Sue Nonweiler
71W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Misty Brown
83W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3.5
Carol Negley
96W–73L career · 6 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
Jacqueline Bartelt
122W–118L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Julie Burns
85W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Collins
74W–54L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.