Teams

LTA-P RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-02vs BRMST TEALLost 14
L#1 DoublesSara Fedorka / Tracey Graham vs Yayoi Shaw / Michelle Schulz0-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesStephanie Mockler vs Meghan Vogel7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Keenan / Charlotte Marsh vs Jeanne Peoples / Kathy Schmidt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHalonah Paiss vs Jane Davis1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Santa / Jency Paul vs Morgan Arvisais / Gail Quinn5-7, 0-6
2023-05-30vs MEA TEALLost 05
L#1 DoublesTracey Graham / Jency Paul vs Fran Katnik / Hilary Wallace6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSara Fedorka vs Curry Rosato2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Marsh / Logan Newens vs Paige Noble / Nancy Travis5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHalonah Paiss vs Heather Middleton3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJanine Ledingham / Susan Keenan vs Kathleen Lupo / Katherine Spines0-6, 0-6
2023-05-23vs LTA-P GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesJency Paul / Stephanie Mockler vs Robin Galloway / Lisa Christie5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTracey Graham vs Katie Melbourne3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHalonah Paiss / Susan Keenan vs Lydia Wuensch / Kelsey Nassar3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSara Fedorka vs Michelle Pulley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanine Clark / Janine Ledingham vs Lesley Bell / Breida Geesaman6-3, 6-1
2023-05-15vs BCC YELLOWLost 23
L#1 DoublesLogan Newens / Susan Keenan vs Leslie Herz / JILLIAN HOLMSTROM0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Mockler vs Rachael Sparks6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJency Paul / Michelle Snyder vs Petra McDonald / Sherilyn Schreier4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTracey Graham vs Katherine Beeck7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Santa / Janine Clark vs Katherine Shaffer / Jung Lindas2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-09vs MEA GREENLost 05
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Marsh / Michelle Snyder vs Monika King / Mary Kaiser2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSara Fedorka vs Julie Schoenfeld1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLogan Newens / Janine Ledingham vs Amy Novak / Laura Geer2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJency Paul vs Lydia Moy2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanine Clark / Sharon Santa vs Leslee Broersma / Jenny Knight0-6, 2-6
2023-04-18vs NJ NAVYLost 05
L#1 DoublesSara Fedorka / Jency Paul vs Alivia Lebeau / Brittany Guidetti0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Mockler vs K Autumn Hartley2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Marsh / Michelle Snyder vs Katherine Lazenby / Renee French3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHalonah Paiss vs Victoria Bull6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanine Ledingham / Janine Clark vs Casey Rhine / Alexandra Pash3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Stephanie Mockler
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Sara Fedorka
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.45
Tracey Graham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Halonah Paiss
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Janine Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Jency Paul
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.10
Charlotte Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Janine Ledingham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Logan Newens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Santa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Keenan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janine Clark + Janine Ledingham4447% games+0.4% vs expected
Michelle Snyder + Charlotte Marsh4544% games−1.8% vs expected
Michelle Snyder + Jency Paul1444% games−2.0% vs expected
Tracey Graham + Sara Fedorka3742% games−2.4% vs expected
Jency Paul + Logan Newens3342% games−7.2% vs expected
Susan Keenan + Janine Ledingham0531% games−10.8% vs expected
Susan Keenan + Tracey Graham2543% games−11.1% vs expected
Sharon Santa + Janine Clark1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Mockler
24W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Sara Fedorka
37W–66L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Tracey Graham
20W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Halonah Paiss
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Janine Clark
28W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Michelle Snyder
26W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Jency Paul
15W–34L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Charlotte Marsh
14W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Janine Ledingham
8W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Logan Newens
13W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Santa
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Keenan
5W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.