Teams

LTA-P GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-23vs LTA-P REDSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLydia Wuensch / Kelsey Nassar vs Halonah Paiss / Susan Keenan6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMichelle Pulley vs Sara Fedorka3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-16vs BCC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesKirsten Roeber / Patricia Jamison vs Rachael Sparks / Katherine Shaffer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Pulley / Donna Louie vs Diana Liu / Leslie Herz6-7, 3-6
2023-05-09vs NJ NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKim Kadlic / Lydia Wuensch vs Alivia Lebeau / Erica Moser6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Pulley / Christina Cope vs Katherine Lazenby / Alexandra Pash2-5
2023-05-02vs MEA TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Pulley / Robin Galloway vs Ania Brakhage / Sara Oclassen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Cope / Lydia Wuensch vs Ande Bernthal / Nikki Boye2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-18vs BRMST TEALLost 02
L#2 DoublesMelissa Bonnette / Breida Geesaman vs Morgan Arvisais / Hillary Riley2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKirsten Roeber / Patricia Jamison vs Kathy Schmidt / Jane Davis3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christina Cope
published 4
3.74
Kim Kadlic
published
3.63
Lydia Wuensch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Robin Galloway
published
3.60
Melissa Bonnette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Michelle Pulley
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Robyn Morgan
published
3.16
Kirsten Roeber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Patricia Jamison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lydia Wuensch + Kim Kadlic2343% games−11.7% vs expected
Patricia Jamison + Kirsten Roeber1432% games−14.7% vs expected
Robin Galloway + Michelle Pulley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Cope
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Kadlic
45W–33L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Lydia Wuensch
65W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.63
Robin Galloway
11W–28L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Melissa Bonnette
40W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Michelle Pulley
38W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Robyn Morgan
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Kirsten Roeber
21W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Patricia Jamison
5W–21L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.