Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Swalberg/Harmon

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-07vs Sunpro-Belliston/AndersonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMary HENSLEY / Angelyn Sorenson vs LaRicia Belliston / Raquel Moss6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Larsen / Jill McEwen vs Gina Anderson / Laura Wills-Mitchell7-5, 6-3
2024-07-31vs Wasatch Rec Center-Studdert/CannonLost 02
L#1 SinglesAnnette Ludlow vs Katie Studdert0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngelyn Sorenson / Mary HENSLEY vs Tracy Davis / Autumn Iverson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-26vs Cottonwood Club-RickerWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill McEwen / Linda Larsen vs Jane Woolley / Tam Pham7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarti Skjervem / Amy Beckstead vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-17vs Sports Mall-Weaver/JohnstonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAngelyn Sorenson / Mary HENSLEY vs Angela Jensen / Alison Pearce4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnnette Ludlow / Wendy Conrad vs Kassie Butt / Karlene Johnston4-6, 1-6
2024-07-10vs Park City MARC-KruegerLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngelyn Sorenson / Mary HENSLEY vs Kelly Krueger / Tricia Byrne6-7, 2-5
L#1 SinglesAmy Beckstead vs Dannan Siano1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Larsen / Jill McEwen vs Jennifer Williams / Melanie Schlachter7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-26vs Sunpro-Belliston/AndersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Harman / Heidi Robinson vs Suzette Greer / Carrie Jensen6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJill McEwen / Mary Jane Swalberg vs Beatriz Velazquez / Marilyn Patch6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-19vs Wasatch Rec Center-Studdert/CannonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Beckstead / Wendy Conrad vs Jennifer Davies / Wendy Heywood3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAngelyn Sorenson / Mary HENSLEY vs Suzette Cannon / Jessica Studdert6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHeidi Robinson / Mary Jane Swalberg vs Tracy Davis / Angela Ritchie4-6, 1-6
2024-06-12vs Cottonwood Club-RickerLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeidi Robinson / Rebecca Harman vs Lori Carter / Taylor Haverkost5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAnnette Ludlow vs Amanda Krejci1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Larsen / Jill McEwen vs Holly Ricker / Jane Woolley6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Mary HENSLEY
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
3.22
Angelyn Sorenson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Jill McEwen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
Amy Beckstead
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.92
Wendy Conrad
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
2.89
Rebecca Harman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
2.78
Marti Skjervem
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Annette Ludlow
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.59
Heidi Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Mary Jane Swalberg
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Linda Larsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annette Ludlow + Amy Beckstead6066% games+14.1% vs expected
Mary HENSLEY + Angelyn Sorenson321757% games+9.2% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Heidi Robinson9458% games+7.1% vs expected
Wendy Conrad + Amy Beckstead10559% games+3.4% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Amy Beckstead3546% games+0.5% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Angelyn Sorenson5548% games−1.5% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Wendy Conrad4254% games−3.1% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + KayeLynn BASTIAN192450% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary HENSLEY
60W–62L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Angelyn Sorenson
71W–52L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Jill McEwen
43W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Amy Beckstead
37W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Wendy Conrad
98W–94L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Rebecca Harman
241W–300L career · 22 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Marti Skjervem
62W–30L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Annette Ludlow
11W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 14 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Heidi Robinson
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.59
Mary Jane Swalberg
75W–203L career · 10 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
Linda Larsen
18W–32L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.