Teams

Sunpro-Belliston/Anderson

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.09 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesCyndi Madsen / Suzette Greer vs KayeLynn BASTIAN / Rebecca Harman3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaRicia Belliston / Raquel Moss vs Mary HENSLEY / Angelyn Sorenson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina Anderson / Laura Wills-Mitchell vs Linda Larsen / Jill McEwen5-7, 3-6
2024-07-31vs Cottonwood Club-RickerWon 30
W#1 DoublesCherylin Winkel / Cyndi Madsen vs Jane Woolley / Amanda Krejci6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarrie Jensen / Gina Anderson vs Robin Asmar / Paula Naatz6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShannon Fredericks / Suzette Greer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-26vs Park City MARC-KruegerLost 12
W#1 DoublesRaquel Moss / Jill Marsh vs Marcey Goldner / Sharon Bush6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCyndi Madsen / Marilyn Patch vs Kelly Krueger / Dannan Siano3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKim Ward / Suzette Greer vs Lori Pfeiffer / Cynthia Perry4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesRaquel Moss / Carrie Jensen vs Jessica Studdert / Jennifer Davies2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCherylin Winkel / Cynthia Bedford vs Tracy Davis / Angela Ritchie6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesShannon Fredericks / Laura Wills-Mitchell vs Sharilee Hill / Jessica Ritchie6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-10Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarrie Jensen / Raquel Moss vs Tara Wood / Rebecca England4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLaRicia Belliston / Cyndi Madsen vs Katie Winson / Kelley Allred4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGina Anderson / Beatriz Velazquez vs Camille Weaver / Krissie Summerhays4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesSuzette Greer / Carrie Jensen vs Rebecca Harman / Heidi Robinson7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeatriz Velazquez / Marilyn Patch vs Jill McEwen / Mary Jane Swalberg1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-19vs Cottonwood Club-RickerWon 21
L#1 DoublesRaquel Moss / Carrie Jensen vs Lori Carter / Jane Woolley4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCherylin Winkel / Kim Ward vs Alison Barber / Tam Pham6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBeatriz Velazquez / Laura Wills-Mitchell vs Jamie Tate / Paula Naatz6-2, 7-5
2024-06-12vs Park City MARC-KruegerLost 12
L#1 DoublesCherylin Winkel / Suzette Greer vs Annie Tilton / Tricia Byrne0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRaquel Moss / Beatriz Velazquez vs Sharon Bush / Marcey Goldner2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLaRicia Belliston / Cyndi Madsen vs Melanie Schlachter / Lauren Karr6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Jill Marsh
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.14
Shannon Fredericks
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Cherylin Winkel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Raquel Moss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Carrie Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Suzette Greer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Cyndi Madsen
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Cynthia Bedford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Beatriz Velazquez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Marilyn Patch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Laura Wills-Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
LaRicia Belliston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Gina Anderson
published
Kim Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Jensen + Suzette Greer8258% games+5.3% vs expected
Beatriz Velazquez + Jill Marsh7163% games+5.3% vs expected
Carrie Jensen + Cherylin Winkel161056% games+4.8% vs expected
Cyndi Madsen + Cherylin Winkel13859% games+4.6% vs expected
Laura Wills-Mitchell + Beatriz Velazquez6457% games+3.6% vs expected
Cyndi Madsen + Raquel Moss331758% games+3.2% vs expected
Marilyn Patch + Carrie Jensen9652% games+1.8% vs expected
Shannon Fredericks + Beatriz Velazquez5158% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Marsh
100W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Shannon Fredericks
89W–63L career · 6 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Cherylin Winkel
112W–142L career · 4 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Raquel Moss
123W–111L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Carrie Jensen
138W–169L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Suzette Greer
75W–73L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Cyndi Madsen
120W–134L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Cynthia Bedford
90W–86L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Beatriz Velazquez
58W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Marilyn Patch
100W–140L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Laura Wills-Mitchell
74W–104L career · 3 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
LaRicia Belliston
85W–115L career · 3 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
2.54
Gina Anderson
56W–77L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Ward
11W–36L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.