Teams

CV-Four Seasons Beaumont/Lou Stokes

2024 SCTA Mixed Doubles 55 & Over - CV · CV Mixed Doubles 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-02vs CV-LLW-Deep Canyon/ZuckerWon 10
W#2 DoublesConnie DeLong / Michael Olson vs Marcia Howell / Jeremy Zucker7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLaura Hibbard / Donald Young vs Farshid Yadegar / Patricia Baughman6-4, 6-2
2024-02-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesJames Clark / Connie DeLong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-10vs CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/P TerharSplit 11
L#1 DoublesConnie DeLong / Lawrence Zimmerman vs Mona Knudslien / Glen Stock1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Hibbard / Donald Young vs PATTY TERHAR / BILL TERHAR6-4, 6-2
2024-02-03vs CV-Shadow Mountain/Kelly HessWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Hibbard / Donald Young vs Lois Owens / Dan Cunningham6-1, 6-0
2024-01-06vs CV-The Springs/Cronyn & E MartinWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Hibbard / Lawrence Zimmerman vs Carol Mallabone / Tom Hiebert6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesConnie DeLong / Michael Olson vs Maurene Cronyn / Richard Siegel7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Mixed Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Julie Perkins
published
3.48
Laura Hibbard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Janet Giles
published
3.35
Connie DeLong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Donald Young
published 3.5
2.88
Hector Calderon
published 3.5
2.73
Annette Flores
published 3
Lawrence Zimmerman
published
Lou Stokes
published
Steven Hovey
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Perkins
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Laura Hibbard
126W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
Janet Giles
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Connie DeLong
49W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Donald Young
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Hector Calderon
7W–20L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Annette Flores
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Lawrence Zimmerman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lou Stokes
52W–60L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Hovey
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.