Teams

CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/P Terhar

2024 SCTA Mixed Doubles 55 & Over - CV · CV Mixed Doubles 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-02-24vs CV-LLW-Deep Canyon/ZuckerLost 01
L#3 DoublesJill Delaney / Roger Davis vs Blair Stone / Brian Yellin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Delaney / Roger Davis vs Paula Buononato / Thomas Wu6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJill Delaney / Bob Lipnosky vs Julie Perkins / Steven Hovey3-6, 2-6
2024-01-27vs CV-Toscana CC/TesslerWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoger Davis / Jill Delaney vs Douglas Schmalz / Rebecca Bratlien6-3, 6-2
2024-01-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesRoger Davis / Jill Delaney vs Dan Gleadle / Rosalee McRae6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Mixed Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Doreen Buchy
published
3.65
Mona Knudslien
published
3.52
PATTY TERHAR
published
3.37
Marti Jablon
published
3.37
Jill Delaney
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Bob Lipnosky
published 3.5
3.19
Patrice Jackson
published
3.17
Barry Cooper
published 3.5
3.07
Terri Johnson
published
3.05
Cesar Vallejo
published 3.5
2.75
BILL TERHAR
published 3
Glen Stock
published
Roger Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PATTY TERHAR + BILL TERHAR224 matchesnot enough data
Glen Stock + Mona Knudslien033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Doreen Buchy
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Mona Knudslien
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
PATTY TERHAR
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Marti Jablon
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Jill Delaney
102W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Bob Lipnosky
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrice Jackson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Barry Cooper
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Terri Johnson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cesar Vallejo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
BILL TERHAR
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Glen Stock
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Roger Davis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.