Teams

Ace Ace In Your Face

2024 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.62 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-09-29vs Game, Set, Martini!Won 10
W#1 DoublesJan Matsumoto / Reina Visaya vs Junko Kadomatsu / Peggy Watanabe6-0, 7-5
2024-09-22vs Miss Hits!Won 10
W#1 DoublesAureana Wong / Jan Matsumoto vs Stacey Merrick / Ellen Ramantin6-0, 6-0
2024-09-08vs Shaka WaveWon 10
W#1 DoublesJan Matsumoto / Caasi Nakasone vs Jane Schumacker / Shaina Yeung6-0, 6-2
2024-09-08vs KRC BADDIESWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Ashley Cabral / Katelyn Sweeney Ching6-3, 6-4
2024-08-31vs DARE DOUBLESWon 10
W#1 DoublesAureana Wong / Reina Visaya vs Yukashi Smith / Jessica Nishikawa6-3, 6-2
2024-08-18vs Miss Hits!Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaasi Nakasone / Aureana Wong vs Praphaporn Downing / Ellen Ramantin6-0, 6-1
2024-08-11vs Game, Set, Martini!Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaasi Nakasone / Jan Matsumoto vs Junko Kadomatsu / Haley Fujimori6-2, 6-1
2024-08-04vs Shaka WaveWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Shaina Yeung / Alyson Yu2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-28vs KRC BADDIESWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaasi Nakasone / Jan Matsumoto vs Shannon Rogers / Ashley Cabral6-4, 7-6
2024-07-21vs DARE DOUBLESWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Tonya Dale / Rachel Motta6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ace Ace In Your Face100100142
2Shaka Wave6464862
3KRC BADDIES6464979
4Game, Set, Martini!6464985
5DARE DOUBLES282817114
6Miss Hits!01001020121

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Irene Ma
published 5
4.42
Reina Visaya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Caasi Nakasone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Aureana Wong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Jan Matsumoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reina Visaya + Aureana Wong28265% games+6.1% vs expected
Caasi Nakasone + Aureana Wong224 matchesnot enough data
Caasi Nakasone + Jan Matsumoto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Irene Ma
28W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Reina Visaya
81W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Caasi Nakasone
135W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Aureana Wong
48W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
Jan Matsumoto
14W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.