Teams

OC Swingin Sistas - CMTC - Tricia - Sat3

OC Fall Team Singles · OC 3.5 W

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-14vs OC Irvine Heritage Park - IreneWon 20
W#2 SinglesDianne Tanger vs Lisabeth Grimm6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJannah Carrasco vs Tatiane Hosotani Yamazaki6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCleo Collier vs Ola Jackson1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesDianne Tanger vs Rosette McClave6-0, 6-3
2025-11-22vs OC LLW LNRC - LijuanLost 01
L#2 SinglesDianne Tanger vs Dayna Marinos1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesDianne Tanger vs Lydia Wong6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesDianne Tanger vs Yuki Kato Maves6-1, 6-2
2025-10-18vs OC LLW LNRC - LijuanSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Melissa Leisure6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJannah Carrasco vs Tracy Qin6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Monica Anderson
published
3.59
Dianne Tanger
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.53
Gretchen Cuzick
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Tricia Bregman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Michelle Lanterman
published
3.35
Jannah Carrasco
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Cleo Collier
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Quynh Nghiem
published
3.23
Trisha Seminoff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cleo Collier + Jannah Carrasco8657% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Anderson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Dianne Tanger
47W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Gretchen Cuzick
133W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Tricia Bregman
114W–117L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Michelle Lanterman
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Jannah Carrasco
84W–81L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Cleo Collier
88W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Quynh Nghiem
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Trisha Seminoff
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.