Teams

WINTER/Huguenot - Rutstein

2024 Duval TriLevel 18 & Over Men - Winter · 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-02vs FYC - GriffithWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Ferguson / Charles King vs Thomas Kent / Jonathon Emmet6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAdam Rutstein / Darren Odendaal vs Vaughn Holland / Wills McVicker6-3, 6-1
2024-03-25vs Palencia - RobinsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesHunter Davis / Corey Graf vs Harrell Robinson / Jim Howick6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDarren Odendaal / Elias Derke vs Steve Copeland / Michael Blazer6-4, 6-3
2024-03-20vs Williams Y - CollinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Ferguson / Hunter Davis vs Jeff Harper / Louis Saig6-2, 6-0
2024-02-21vs FYC - GriffithLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles King / Hunter Davis vs Jonathon Emmet / Chuck Griffith6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-13vs Jax Golf - HurseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Ferguson / Corey Graf vs Tim Orr / Cameron Nash4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-06vs Williams Y - CollinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesHunter Davis / Charles King vs Daniel Oberholtzer / Ian Faulkner6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDarren Odendaal / Elias Derke vs Jason Collins / Spencer Henderson6-1, 6-0
2024-01-30vs Palencia - RobinsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Ferguson / Charles King vs Harrell Robinson / Christian Hosking6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
William Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Corey Graf
published 4.5
4.06
Adam Rutstein
published 4.5
4.06
Darren Odendaal
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.98
Hunter Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Elias Derke
published
3.46
Robert Radel
published
3.31
Rob DeJesus
published
3.21
Ben Landis
published 3.5
Eric Gebicke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Ferguson + Darren Odendaal404 matchesnot enough data
Hunter Davis + Darren Odendaal404 matchesnot enough data
Ben Landis + Rob DeJesus314 matchesnot enough data
William Ferguson + Hunter Davis303 matchesnot enough data
Darren Odendaal + Adam Rutstein123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Ferguson
93W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.81
4.5
Corey Graf
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Adam Rutstein
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
4.5
Darren Odendaal
185W–105L career · 8 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
Hunter Davis
63W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
Elias Derke
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
Robert Radel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
Rob DeJesus
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Ben Landis
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Eric Gebicke
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.