Teams

Jax Golf - Hursey

2024 Duval TriLevel 18 & Over Men - Winter · 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-09vs Williams Y - CollinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Prouty / Cameron Nash vs Daniel Oberholtzer / Jeff Harper2-6, 0-6
2024-03-26vs WINTER/Huguenot - RutsteinLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Prouty / Cameron Nash vs Charles King / Corey Graf6-7, 1-6
2024-03-19vs FYC - GriffithLost 01
L#2 DoublesSpencer Merriam / Bill Merriam vs Vaughn Holland / Christopher Johnson4-6, 2-6
2024-02-13vs WINTER/Huguenot - RutsteinLost 01
L#2 DoublesLyle Hursey / Bill Merriam vs Elias Derke / Chris Le0-6, 0-6
2024-02-06vs FYC - GriffithWon 10
W#2 DoublesEric Lazo / Thomas Prouty vs Vaughn Holland / Richard Crittenden4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Tim Orr
published
4.01
Darin Pobst
published 4
3.82
Thomas Prouty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Johnny Witt
published
3.68
Bill Merriam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Mohsen Akhlaghi
published
3.56
Eric Lazo
published
3.39
Jeff Gallagher
published
3.33
Lyle Hursey
published
3.26
Jonathan Schwartz
published
3.25
Michael Mayer
published
Keith Komline
published
Michael Bosshart
published
Spencer Merriam
published
Tim Wedel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Mayer + Lyle Hursey2638% games−4.6% vs expected
Keith Komline + Thomas Prouty2347% gamesnot enough data
Michael Mayer + Michael Bosshart4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Orr
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
4.38
4
Darin Pobst
104W–74L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
Thomas Prouty
90W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Johnny Witt
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Bill Merriam
89W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Mohsen Akhlaghi
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Eric Lazo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Jeff Gallagher
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.39
Lyle Hursey
21W–30L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Jonathan Schwartz
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
Michael Mayer
16W–27L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Keith Komline
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Bosshart
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Spencer Merriam
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Wedel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.