Teams

CCC-Hoffman

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-01-13Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRena Millwood / Lindsey McCamy vs Nancy Tate / Amanda Wilcox2-6, 7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesPaula Hoffman vs Joanna Stephenson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie White / Shawn Shields vs Karen Bart / Cheryl Russell6-4, 4-6, 4-6
2024-12-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesLeslie White / Rena Millwood vs Linda Adcock / Cathy Kupstas6-4, 6-1
2024-11-22vs Hog Mountain-RussellLost 13
L#1 DoublesRena Millwood / Jennifer Loggins vs Dori Blanchard / Cheryl Russell6-4, 3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Watkins vs Joanna Stephenson2-6, 6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPaula Hoffman / Pamela Jackson vs Jaime Christian / Barbara Jenkins7-5, 2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesGail Chester / Kim Reeves vs Kay Forrest / Cindy Latouf1-6, 0-6
2024-11-08vs Alberta Banks - JakinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Smithson / Leslie White vs Jan Pearce / Yvette van der Wiel6-4, 3-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPaula Hoffman / Jennifer Loggins vs Beth Arends / Patricia Brewer6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGail Greene / Lindsey McCamy vs Cathy Kupstas / Gayle Hipple6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Allison Kimbrell
published 4
3.53
Jeannine Callahan
published
3.50
Danielle Allenbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Amanda Watkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Jennifer Loggins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Rena Millwood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Pamela Jackson
published
3.17
Kim Reeves
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Paula Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Gail Chester
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Gail Greene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie White
published
Lindsey McCamy
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Shawn Shields
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Gillespie
published
Susan Smithson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Loggins + Danielle Allenbach13456% games+2.3% vs expected
Amanda Watkins + Jeannine Callahan5257% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Loggins + Paula Hoffman224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Loggins + Kim Reeves213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Reeves + Jeannine Callahan213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Smithson + Paula Hoffman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Kimbrell
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Jeannine Callahan
26W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
3.5
Danielle Allenbach
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Amanda Watkins
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Jennifer Loggins
42W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Rena Millwood
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Pamela Jackson
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Kim Reeves
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Paula Hoffman
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Gail Chester
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gail Greene
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leslie White
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey McCamy
20W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Shields
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Gillespie
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Smithson
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.