Teams

Hog Mountain-Russell

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-20vs NEGTA/April CroweLost 01
L#1 DoublesDori Blanchard / Cheryl Russell vs Jill Richardson / Patricia Melton0-6, 4-6
2024-12-13vs Longwood-ConnollyWon 10
W#2 DoublesDori Blanchard / Cheryl Russell vs Harriet Connolly / Suzanne Fries6-1, 6-0
2024-11-22vs CCC-HoffmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesDori Blanchard / Cheryl Russell vs Rena Millwood / Jennifer Loggins4-6, 6-3, 6-3
2024-11-15vs Alberta Banks - JakinsWon 10
W#4 DoublesCheryl Russell / Dori Blanchard vs Paula Fagan / Suzanne Hanley6-4, 6-2
2024-11-08vs NEGTA/April CroweLost 01
L#4 DoublesKaren Lynn / Nancy Tate vs Kirstin Risse / Mandi Stokes5-7, 1-6
2024-11-01vs Longwood-ConnollyLost 01
L#1 SinglesDori Blanchard vs Angela Lindsay0-6, 6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Shelly Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.91
Kristan Stroner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.91
Dori Blanchard
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.89
Karen Bart
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.86
Jill Deitz
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Amanda Wilcox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Nancy Tate
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.79
Kay Forrest
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Joanna Stephenson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Jaime Christian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
3.68
Cheryl Russell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.66
Cindy Latouf
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.62
Kim Beasley
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.42
Karen Lynn
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Lazonia Jordan
published
Mai Shedd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Tate + Dori Blanchard12166% games+12.7% vs expected
Jaime Christian + Kristan Stroner8072% games+7.7% vs expected
Amanda Wilcox + Dori Blanchard7355% games+6.3% vs expected
Kristan Stroner + Nancy Tate12266% games+4.0% vs expected
Karen Bart + Shelly Hunt14462% games+1.5% vs expected
Jaime Christian + Nancy Tate2346% games−0.5% vs expected
Cheryl Russell + Kay Forrest5356% games−1.7% vs expected
Cheryl Russell + Dori Blanchard11655% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelly Hunt
41W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Kristan Stroner
40W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Dori Blanchard
50W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
Karen Bart
35W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Jill Deitz
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Amanda Wilcox
29W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Nancy Tate
63W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Kay Forrest
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Joanna Stephenson
39W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Jaime Christian
67W–66L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Cheryl Russell
40W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Cindy Latouf
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Kim Beasley
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Karen Lynn
46W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.42
Lazonia Jordan
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mai Shedd
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.