Teams

EM BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-22vs WP BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Winslow / Tammy Terhaar vs KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK / Jennifer Pollman6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEllen Leher / Janet Willson vs Trace Salzano / MELISSA DRAZEN-SMITH6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Engeman / Kathy Klein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-12vs HW BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesRebecca Winslow / Dana Keefe vs Susan Wist / Alicia Thorne4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs Julie King6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Allen / Meg Overstake vs Anne-Marie Hukriede / Jamie Vonfeldt6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrooke Bolinske / Ellen Leher vs Mary Morris / Traci Yuran3-6, 0-6
2022-07-05vs GAC PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Keefe / Janet Willson vs Laura Routh / Jonna Mulqueen1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Overstake / Susan Engeman vs Tracy Sickels / Lauren Elmakis0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEllen Leher / Brooke Bolinske vs Kay Christensen / Rhonda Buder3-6, 4-6
2022-06-28vs GNO GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTammy Terhaar / Rebecca Winslow vs Lori Kraatz / Meg Swearingen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Schiffner vs Erin Chain6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Willson / Lisa Allen vs Meg Braun / Taylor Surroz3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLindsey MClintock / Brooke Bolinske vs Katie Frisch / Erica Mabry1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-21vs SSD REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Allen / Janet Willson vs Nanci Cheberenchick / Marjery Clark3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs Allie Molinda6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDana Keefe / Susan Engeman vs Stella Madrid / Cheryl Shelhamer6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrooke Bolinske / Lindsey MClintock vs Anja Korhonen / Debbie Sabato6-3, 6-3
2022-06-14vs GCC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesKristen Schiffner / Susan Engeman vs Allison Kaelberer / Sarah Dennis7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs Hillary Conway2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Allen / Janet Willson vs Keena Metcalf / Karen Raftery3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Leher / Kathy Klein vs Christina Arnold / Emer Dempsey3-6, 5-7
2022-06-13vs CHCC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesSusan Engeman / Rebecca Winslow vs Pamela Trigg / Katy Truitt5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKristen Schiffner vs Nanette Baumbusch6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDana Keefe / Ellen Leher vs Angela Lercara / Kirstin Simmons1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Klein / Brooke Bolinske vs Holly Garnsey / Bevin Wallace7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Tammy Terhaar
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Ellen Leher
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Dana Keefe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Kathy Klein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Brooke Bolinske
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Kristen Schiffner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Janet Willson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.50
Susan Engeman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Lindsey MClintock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Meg Overstake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Winslow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Bolinske + Ellen Leher6361% games+9.3% vs expected
Meg Overstake + Rebecca Winslow4842% games−0.8% vs expected
Kathy Klein + Brooke Bolinske1442% games−1.7% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Kathy Klein21041% games−3.3% vs expected
Kathy Klein + Lindsey MClintock3243% games−7.7% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Janet Willson2537% games−9.7% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Kristen Schiffner3260% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Klein + Janet Willson4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tammy Terhaar
62W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3
Ellen Leher
84W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Dana Keefe
23W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Klein
43W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Brooke Bolinske
78W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Kristen Schiffner
21W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.50
Janet Willson
23W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Susan Engeman
31W–62L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.50
Lindsey MClintock
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Meg Overstake
11W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Winslow
24W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.