Teams

SSD RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs GAC PINKLost 04
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Smith / Cheryl Shelhamer vs Lauren Elmakis / Rhonda Buder1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAllie Molinda vs Wendy Liu1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Steigerwald / Marjery Clark vs Jonna Mulqueen / Laura Routh1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStella Madrid / Anja Korhonen vs Katherine Flahive / Tracy Sickels2-6, 4-6
2022-07-12vs GNO GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesNanci Cheberenchick / Cheryl Shelhamer vs Cheryl Badger / Erica Mabry7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMarjery Clark vs Lori Kraatz1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStella Madrid / Evelyn Smith vs Erin Chain / Lauren Hillary4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Steigerwald / Kari Graham vs Meg Swearingen / Katie Frisch4-6, 1-6
2022-07-05vs CHCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKari Graham / Debbie Sabato vs Holly Garnsey / Nanette Baumbusch5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAllie Molinda vs Kelly Stava6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Steigerwald / Stella Madrid vs Allison Perkins / Pamela Trigg4-6, 0-6
2022-06-28vs GCC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Smith / Stella Madrid vs Karen Raftery / Karen Terry1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAllie Molinda vs Allison Kaelberer5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Sabato / Nanci Cheberenchick vs Christine Viney / Emer Dempsey3-3
L#3 DoublesMarjery Clark / Cheryl Shelhamer vs Sarah Dennis / Rebecca Givens3-6, 1-6
2022-06-21vs EM BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesNanci Cheberenchick / Marjery Clark vs Lisa Allen / Janet Willson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAllie Molinda vs Tammy Terhaar2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStella Madrid / Cheryl Shelhamer vs Dana Keefe / Susan Engeman3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnja Korhonen / Debbie Sabato vs Brooke Bolinske / Lindsey MClintock3-6, 3-6
2022-06-14vs WP BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesKari Graham / Debbie Sabato vs Jennifer Pollman / KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAllie Molinda vs Trace Salzano6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStella Madrid / Cheryl Shelhamer vs MELISSA DRAZEN-SMITH / Andrea Chase5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnja Korhonen / Anne Steigerwald vs Mary Ocampo / Leslie Bonato6-0, 6-0
2022-06-07vs HW BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesNanci Cheberenchick / Marjery Clark vs Susan Wist / Mary Morris6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAnja Korhonen vs Alicia Thorne6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStella Madrid / Kari Graham vs Jamie Vonfeldt / Julie King6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Steigerwald / Debbie Sabato vs Jennifer Kuptz / Anne-Marie Hukriede6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allie Molinda
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Cheryl Shelhamer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Evelyn Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Kari Graham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Debbie Sabato
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.48
Stella Madrid
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
Anja Korhonen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Anne Steigerwald
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Marjery Clark
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Nanci Cheberenchick
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sandra Brock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marjery Clark + Cheryl Shelhamer4453% games+5.6% vs expected
Debbie Sabato + Evelyn Smith4151% games+3.7% vs expected
Marjery Clark + Nanci Cheberenchick8551% games+1.3% vs expected
Debbie Sabato + Kari Graham4549% games+0.0% vs expected
Cheryl Shelhamer + Nanci Cheberenchick3252% games−3.1% vs expected
Kari Graham + Evelyn Smith2440% games−8.1% vs expected
Anja Korhonen + Cheryl Shelhamer2352% gamesnot enough data
Marjery Clark + Evelyn Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allie Molinda
13W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cheryl Shelhamer
19W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Evelyn Smith
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Kari Graham
103W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Debbie Sabato
24W–39L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Stella Madrid
61W–80L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Anja Korhonen
7W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Anne Steigerwald
12W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marjery Clark
23W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nanci Cheberenchick
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Brock
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.