Teams

MLadd

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-19vs JBYRD-CAPSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBruce Mildwurf / Bryan Gillespie vs Jermaine Byrd / Andrew Belonga6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDavis Felts / Philippe Adams vs Ryan Lewis / Wes Watson0-6, 6-7
2022-05-08vs BKOREN18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavis Felts / Mark Camacho vs James JR Compton / Mark Masters6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-01vs BHardwickLost 01
L#1 DoublesBryan Gillespie / Davis Felts vs Michael Roach / Chris Julich7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-24vs PKellyWon 10
W#2 DoublesPhilippe Adams / Bryan Gillespie vs Ken Glanville / Cliff Manion6-1, 6-2
2022-04-03vs JBYRD-CAPLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilippe Adams / Fred Black vs Geoffrey Vollman / Andrew Waddell7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRodrigo Andrew / Davis Felts vs Andrew Belonga / Kevin Sierra1-6, 2-6
2022-03-27vs BKOREN18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesBryan Gillespie / Davis Felts vs Benjamin Koren / Garrett Frank5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-20vs BHardwickWon 10
W#3 DoublesPhilippe Adams / Mark Camacho vs Joshua Ganeles / Blake Hutchinson6-2, 7-6
2022-03-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesBruce Mildwurf / Philippe Adams vs Peter Kelly / Isaac Hardison6-3, 6-2
2022-03-06vs CSCHAUMAN18Won 20
W#1 DoublesRodrigo Andrew / Davis Felts vs Connor Funk / Tyler Newman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPhilippe Adams / Bryan Gillespie vs Paul Weisner / Ben McConnaughey6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Bruce Mildwurf
published 4.5
4.34
Kevin Powell
published
4.10
Davis Felts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
Bryan Gillespie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.83
Philippe Adams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.73
Mark Camacho
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philippe Adams + Davis Felts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bruce Mildwurf
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.45
Kevin Powell
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Davis Felts
63W–95L career · 6 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Bryan Gillespie
28W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Philippe Adams
81W–74L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Mark Camacho
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.