Teams

BC-MCC/AmySchmargen

2022 Adult 40 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kirsten Helvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Monika Kiznis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.79
Robin Terry
published
3.73
Sonja Harrington
published
3.67
Jeanette Chun
published
3.63
Ellen Lauricella
published 4
3.63
Sarah Nedelman
published
3.47
Anne Gumm
published 3.5
3.27
Sandy Quigley
published
3.23
Amanda Gregory
published 3.5
3.21
Mari Bellas
published
3.17
Maricel Rocha
published
3.10
Rachel Alexander
published
3.08
Teal Levine
published
3.04
Amy Schmargen
published 3
Eileen Baral
published
Nicole Shepley
published
Tracey Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonja Harrington + Kirsten Helvey5452% games−5.3% vs expected
Monika Kiznis + Kirsten Helvey5067% gamesnot enough data
Jeanette Chun + Kirsten Helvey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kirsten Helvey
124W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Monika Kiznis
101W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Robin Terry
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Sonja Harrington
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Jeanette Chun
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Ellen Lauricella
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Sarah Nedelman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Anne Gumm
67W–51L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
Sandy Quigley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amanda Gregory
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Mari Bellas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Maricel Rocha
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Teal Levine
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Amy Schmargen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
Eileen Baral
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Shepley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracey Carey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.