Teams

Heritage Bay - L. Keillor

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.86 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-06vs Pelican Bay Park - N. BlackWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Keillor / Carole Flegel vs Joanne Blum / JANE BRUDERS5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-11-29vs Players Club - J. WautersLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarole Flegel / Diana Pleeter vs Sherry Cummings / Sheila Smith6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-11-15vs Cambier - GustLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Keillor / Gina Garfunkel vs Sheila MacNicol / Caroline Rogers6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Carole Flegel vs Lisa Ruffolo / Cheryl Cohen1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Keillor / Gina Garfunkel vs Debra Bowman / Gail Hayton6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-11-01vs Esplanade- SteuererWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Keillor / Diana Pleeter vs Lorraine Steuerer / Tina Albright6-2, 6-2
2021-10-25vs Naples Reserve - HugginsLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Hess / Lauren Keillor vs Maria Blakslee / Mary Mastrogiacomo1-6, 4-6
2021-10-18vs 2nd Fall - Grey OaksSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Carole Flegel vs Margaret Werchek / Debra Logue0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Hess / Lauren Keillor vs Carolyn Romano / Karen Tambellini6-4, 7-6
2021-10-11vs Sterling Oaks - KawellWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarole Flegel / Diana Pleeter vs Cindy Hockman / Barbara Beard6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Gina Garfunkel
published 4
Annette Brennan
published 4
Carole Flegel
published 4
3.74
Diana Pleeter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
3.35
Susie Beaudet
published
3.32
Lauren Keillor
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.97
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Pleeter + Lauren Keillor191450% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gina Garfunkel
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Annette Brennan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Carole Flegel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Diana Pleeter
139W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Barbara Fortunato
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Lauren Keillor
161W–184L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Jacqui ONeal Privitere
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.