Teams

Esplanade- Steuerer

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Halliday / Michele Colgate vs Ginger Ferraez / Heidi Schultz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-11-29vs Pelican Bay Park - NavarroLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Halliday / Michele Colgate vs Lori Coates / Angela Springer3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKatherine MacWilliams / Tina Albright vs Mary Wright / Janice Forner5-7, 3-6
2021-11-22vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Colgate / Tina Albright vs Maria Blakslee / Marianne Khayat1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-11-15vs Pelican Bay Park - N. BlackWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Halliday / Michele Colgate vs Joanne Blum / Catherine Barsky7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatherine MacWilliams / Tina Albright vs Jodi Petkovich / Leigh Traut0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-11-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Halliday / Michele Colgate vs Tasha Christiansen / Flavia Jorge6-4, 6-2
2021-11-01Split 11
W#1 DoublesMichele Colgate / Carol Halliday vs Barbara Hess / Carole Flegel6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLorraine Steuerer / Tina Albright vs Lauren Keillor / Diana Pleeter2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesErika Klein / Tina Albright vs Lisa Ruffolo / Terry Dirr4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarol Halliday / Michele Colgate vs Gail Hayton / Debra Bowman1-6, 1-6
2021-10-18vs Cambier - GustLost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Albright / Donna Jensen vs Marzenna Nowak / Terri Tucci1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Donna Jensen
published 4
3.71
Carol Halliday
published 4
3.63
Debbie Vorpahl
published 4
3.37
3.35
Tina Albright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Kathleen Iverson
published
Karin Dayton
published
Lorraine Steuerer
published
Lynn Damico
published
Michele Colgate
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Jensen
27W–18L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Carol Halliday
69W–42L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Debbie Vorpahl
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Katherine MacWilliams
32W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
Tina Albright
17W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
Kathleen Iverson
50W–73L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Karin Dayton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lanette Disera-Geissler
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorraine Steuerer
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Damico
64W–60L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michele Colgate
25W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.