Teams

LTA RED

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-23vs CSU GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Santelices / Carol Bradford vs Jesse Chavez / Susanna Styve4-6, 2-6
2021-05-22vs LVTALost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Schupp / Jeffrey Santelices vs Lindsey Welch / Jameson Lumpkin4-6, 2-6
2021-05-22vs FCCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Santelices / Carol Bradford vs Carmen Kilday / Bill Bruschke6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-25vs LTA YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesTibi Strazzera / James Callanan vs Orit Ostrowiak / Anish Parikh6-7, 4-6
2021-04-18vs CSU GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Bradford / James Callanan vs Mitzi Johnson / Chad Schneider6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-04vs CSU GREENLost 02
L#2 DoublesSarah Schupp / James Callanan vs Jacob Escobedo / Hanna Grow-Morales2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMridula Sugadhan / Jeffrey Santelices vs Ginger Phillips / Austin Stege3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Brooke Larson
published 4.5
Brian Loflin
published 4.5
4.24
James Callanan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Sarah Schupp
published
4.11
Jeffrey Santelices
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.02
David Henderson
published 4.5
3.94
Carol Bradford
published 4
3.82
Idi Omar
published 4
Mridula Sugadhan
published
Tibi Strazzera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Bradford + Idi Omar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Larson
20W–25L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Brian Loflin
8W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
James Callanan
27W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
Sarah Schupp
20W–26L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Jeffrey Santelices
9W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
David Henderson
8W–31L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Carol Bradford
35W–47L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Idi Omar
53W–81L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
Mridula Sugadhan
20W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tibi Strazzera
9W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.