Teams

FCCC

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.57 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-22vs LTA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Wallace / Shawn Farnell vs Brian Loflin / Mridula Sugadhan6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarmen Kilday / Bill Bruschke vs Jeffrey Santelices / Carol Bradford3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-09vs LVTAWon 20
W#2 DoublesElin Farnell / Shawn Farnell vs Lindsey Welch / Jameson Lumpkin6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChad Lace / Carmen Kilday vs Todd Kooi / Caryl Abeyta6-2, 6-4
2021-05-02vs LTA YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarmen Kilday / Chad Lace vs Heather Brinkman / Brandon Nelsen4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElin Farnell / Shawn Farnell vs Tucker Humphrey / Anish Parikh6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-25vs CSU GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesShawn Farnell / Elin Farnell vs Suzanne Hale / Dale Oberlag6-3, 6-0
2021-04-18vs CSU GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Wallace / Shawn Farnell vs Katherine Selby / Ryan Selby7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChad Lace / Elin Farnell vs Ginger Phillips / Austin Stege7-6, 6-3
2021-04-04vs LVTALost 01
L#1 DoublesElin Farnell / Shawn Farnell vs Daniel Jackson / Caryl Abeyta6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Elin Farnell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.43
Andrea Wallace
published 4.5
4.31
Shawn Farnell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Carmen Kilday
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Eric Himler
published 4.5
Erika Preuss
published 4.5
4.05
Bill Bruschke
published 4.5
3.94
Kimberly Tomlinson
published
Rhonda Bruschke
published
Robert Kuseski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elin Farnell + Shawn Farnell5651% games+6.1% vs expected
Shawn Farnell + Andrea Wallace1842% games−12.6% vs expected
Robert Kuseski + Andrea Wallace303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Elin Farnell
50W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
4.63
4.5
Andrea Wallace
37W–29L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Shawn Farnell
78W–76L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Carmen Kilday
79W–56L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.26
4.5
Eric Himler
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Erika Preuss
9W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Bill Bruschke
8W–22L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
Kimberly Tomlinson
40W–38L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.94
Rhonda Bruschke
11W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Kuseski
14W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.