Teams

ALMADEN SR 18AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-12vs BRAMHALL PK 18AW3.5A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Cesario / Rebecca McCarthy vs Diane Bauman / Sandra Pelino6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRosy Chobanian vs Florence Jullian5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathleen Watson / Monique Vandenberg vs Tara O'Grady / Yuka Sumi0-6, 3-6
2025-04-11vs BRAMHALL PK 18AW3.5A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Caouette / Melynda Davenport vs Rita Sandhu / Jett Koketsu7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesFrancesca Paolini vs Amy Roubound7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Cesario / Rebecca McCarthy vs Kay Yonemoto / Sandra Pelino6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Julie Boncher
published
3.48
Melynda Davenport
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Catherine Caouette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Heather Kent
published
3.33
Janice Passarello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
KRISTEN SAXON
published
3.32
Lisa Cesario
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Rebecca McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Jill Anderson
published
3.22
Kathleen Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Debbie Gililland
published 3.5
3.18
Rosy Chobanian
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Julia Scott
published
3.16
Francesca Paolini
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Monique Vandenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca McCarthy + Lisa Cesario5073% games+12.4% vs expected
Julie Boncher + Janice Passarello4260% games+0.7% vs expected
Janice Passarello + Lisa Cesario5352% games−1.0% vs expected
Catherine Caouette + Melynda Davenport314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Boncher + Lisa Cesario213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Anderson + KRISTEN SAXON123 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Gililland + Janice Passarello213 matchesnot enough data
Julia Scott + Rebecca McCarthy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Boncher
31W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Melynda Davenport
38W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Catherine Caouette
33W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Heather Kent
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Janice Passarello
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
KRISTEN SAXON
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Lisa Cesario
22W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Rebecca McCarthy
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Jill Anderson
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Kathleen Watson
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Debbie Gililland
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Rosy Chobanian
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Julia Scott
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Francesca Paolini
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Monique Vandenberg
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.