Teams

SD WE LT RPTC/ Ng

2025 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WE- Summer SD · SDNC

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Ann Hou
published 4
3.77
Deborah Parks
published 4
3.68
Desiree Seager
published 4
3.47
Darcy Karpman
published 3.5
3.26
Cheryl Shah
published 3.5
3.17
Jenn Lau
published 3.5
3.17
Terri Oates
published
3.06
Maysoon Aziz
published 3.5
2.94
Rita Murphy
published
2.89
Sheryl Nelson
published
2.76
Beth Levine
published 3
2.66
Katherine Ng
published
Khanh Nguyen
published
Stacy Herman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Desiree Seager + Shelley Federhart12756% games+0.0% vs expected
Darcy Karpman + Cheryl Shah8650% gamesnot enough data
Beth Levine + Katherine Ng134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Hou
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Shelley Federhart
61W–74L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Deborah Parks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Desiree Seager
112W–100L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Darcy Karpman
94W–53L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Cheryl Shah
41W–42L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Jenn Lau
45W–38L career · type A · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Terri Oates
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Maysoon Aziz
21W–43L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Rita Murphy
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Sheryl Nelson
0W–16L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Beth Levine
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Katherine Ng
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Khanh Nguyen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Herman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.