Teams

CTL40/CLARK/CTC

Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - USTA · 40 & Over Mixed 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-21vs CTL40/Layden/WWDWon 10
W#1 DoublesKemper Amick / Lynne Houser vs Alexander McDonald / Laura Shwedo4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-14vs CTL40/ANDERSON/WRCLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Houser / David Belman vs Candace Aguiar / Chris Collins2-6, 3-6
2022-05-24vs CTL40/Szwec/WRCWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Houser / David Belman vs Amanda Henry / Kenneth Henry6-3, 6-1
2022-05-16vs CTL40/SIAU/GVWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Church / Lynne Houser vs Christopher Siau / Teri Colden7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-10vs CTL40/RUSSELL/CTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Houser / David Belman vs Nathan Sanders / Helen Russell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-26vs CTL40/FREEMAN/GVWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Marshall / Lynne Houser vs Joel Rodriguez / Venetta Jagan6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Tom Tracy
published
3.47
Susan Steck
published
3.40
Kemper Amick
published
3.37
David Belman
published 3.5
Caroline Allen
published 3.5
3.25
Stephen Marshall
published
3.24
Angela Gahagan
published 3.5
3.19
Christopher Church
published 3.5
3.07
Lynne Houser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Lucius Jumper
published
Thomas Jackson
published
Tina Clark
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Tracy
120W–73L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
Susan Steck
91W–51L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
Kemper Amick
28W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
David Belman
39W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Caroline Allen
46W–54L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Marshall
50W–47L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Angela Gahagan
47W–45L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Christopher Church
29W–53L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Lynne Houser
97W–107L career · 6 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Lucius Jumper
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Jackson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Clark
38W–69L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.