Teams

Garner: Smithfield

2025 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-26vs Gustas & Brown: BlackhawkLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrick Cosgrove / Tom Randall vs Brenton Kuchera / Nicholas Petaros2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Suther / Jeffrey Garner vs Raymond Whalen / Jeff Mullenix2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTyler Karrels / Trevor McCann vs Zachary Manders / Rick Brown6-1, 6-0
2025-03-29vs Sichterman: NDACLost 05
L#1 DoublesDavid Perkins / Tyler Karrels vs Michael Madsen / Steve Bohn5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Garner vs David Hash2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTim Carstensen / Tom Randall vs Kunj Saxena / Sean Donovan1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKyle Suther vs Seth Boysen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarcus Womersley / Charles Errington vs Benjamin Curley / Jim Sichterman3-6, 3-6
2025-03-08vs Childers: ClintonWon 31
W#1 DoublesTyler Karrels / Trevor McCann vs Joe Slavens / William Hughes6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTim Carstensen vs Steffen Timmer0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Errington / Patrick Cosgrove vs John Stierman / Kevin Halligan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Bowers / Jeffrey Garner vs Joseph Millam / Randy Childers7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-01vs Childers: ClintonLost 05
L#1 DoublesRobert Bowers / Tom Randall vs John Stierman / Jim Luebke5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCharles Errington vs Steffen Timmer1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Suther / Patrick Cosgrove vs Joe Slavens / William Hughes4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTim Carstensen vs Ryan Cahalan5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Odegaard / Christopher Schirm vs Daniel Ellard / Garrett Ellard1-6, 1-6
2025-01-18vs Sichterman: NDACLost 14
L#1 DoublesKyle Suther / Charles Errington vs Jim Sichterman / Fred Radunzel1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDavid Perkins vs Ryan Murphy7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTrevor McCann / Tom Randall vs Wahyu Boentoro / Kunj Saxena6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDouglas Allemang vs Dominick Rath1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Schirm / Tim Carstensen vs Mark Steckel / Sean Donovan3-6, 2-6
2025-01-04vs Gustas & Brown: BlackhawkLost 14
L#1 DoublesTim Carstensen / Kyle Suther vs Nicholas Petaros / Raymond Whalen1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCharles Errington vs Chris Gustas2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarcus Womersley / Tyler Karrels vs Brenton Kuchera / Adam Ramker7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDouglas Allemang vs Jeff Mullenix3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Odegaard / Rob Taylor vs Adam Ernsting / John Bothwell5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sichterman: NDAC6024612204
2IA/Jha/Hanson/18&Over4.0M6025516216
3Gustas & Brown: Blackhawk33141634281
4Staiert & Baeth: Lifetime24111940303
5Versteeg: Genesis1592145315
6Garner: Smithfield1562451340

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Kyle Suther
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Tyler Karrels
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Marcus Womersley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
David Perkins
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Charles Errington
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.44
Tim Carstensen
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.24
Patrick Cosgrove
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.18
Steven Odegaard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Tom Randall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Jeffrey Garner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Douglas Allemang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Cosgrove + Tim Carstensen7950% games−0.0% vs expected
Tim Carstensen + Tom Randall1442% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Cosgrove + Tom Randall134 matchesnot enough data
Steven Odegaard + Douglas Allemang033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Suther
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Tyler Karrels
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Marcus Womersley
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
David Perkins
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Charles Errington
7W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Tim Carstensen
51W–44L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Patrick Cosgrove
30W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Steven Odegaard
7W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Tom Randall
27W–59L career · 10 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
Jeffrey Garner
2W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Douglas Allemang
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.