Teams

Indep-McKay

2021 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-17vs KTAC-FitzgeraldSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDan Kilmer / Kathi McKay vs Eric Moe / Kristi Gonzalez6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDave Ketchum / Jill Waters vs Bill Boyett / Karen Fossum4-6, 4-6
2021-08-15vs KTAC-FitzgeraldLost 12
W#1 DoublesDan Kilmer / Kathi McKay vs Christine Cattell / John Cattell6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaria Robinson / Kevin Robinson vs Karen Fossum / Bill Boyett4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAbby Grant / Rob Kirkwood vs Kristi Gonzalez / Eric Moe3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-21vs KTAC-FitzgeraldLost 12
L#1 DoublesAbby Grant / Rich Grant vs Kristi Gonzalez / Bill Boyett5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJill Waters / Dan Kilmer vs Christine Cattell / John Cattell3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMaria Robinson / Kevin Robinson vs Diane Koch / William McKenna7-6, 6-3
2021-07-14vs KTAC-FitzgeraldLost 12
L#1 DoublesDan Kilmer / Jill Waters vs Christine Cattell / John Cattell3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathi McKay / Dave Ketchum vs Karen Fossum / Bill Boyett6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaria Robinson / Kevin Robinson vs Kristi Gonzalez / Eric Moe3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTAC-Fitzgerald40849100
2Indep-McKay044816122

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Abby Grant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Kathi McKay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Maria Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Kevin Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Jill Waters
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dan Kilmer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 0
Dave Ketchum
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathi McKay + Kevin Robinson3256% gamesnot enough data
Kathi McKay + Dave Ketchum224 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Robinson + Maria Robinson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abby Grant
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Kathi McKay
204W–146L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Maria Robinson
62W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kevin Robinson
54W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Jill Waters
104W–94L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
0
Dan Kilmer
21W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Dave Ketchum
76W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.