← Search

Dan Kilmer

TUMWATER, WA
0.0 year-end
53 matches · 21W–32L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Dan sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Dan is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dan has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 50.6% of games
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 55.1% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.4% of games
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history53 matches
L
2021-11-06 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Ketchum
−0.021below expectation — took 43% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2021-10-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Ketchum
−0.010about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Michel Robert / Karin Mattsonmixed
2021-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patty Kilmer
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 40% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2021-08-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathi McKay
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2021-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathi McKay
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2021-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Waters
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Tyler Fix / Kathleen Stevenschamps
2021-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Patty Kilmer
−0.040below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2021-07-16 · #3 Doubles · with Patty Kilmer
+0.040better than expected — took 29% of games against 22% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Catherine Thom / Ryan Chanchamps
2021-07-16 · #3 Doubles · with Patty Kilmer
−0.038below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2021-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Waters
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Steven Sparks / Christopher Stickneychamps
2021-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin Robinson
−0.029below expectation — took 42% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2021-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Ketchum
+0.014better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.