Teams

BCC GOLD

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

12 players · average NTRP 3.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-06vs RMTC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSamantha Bennett / Susan Hirano vs Tracey McCoy / Tamny Costello3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChristina Eisenhard / Brandi Lipton vs Robin Noble / Carol Hoeffler6-1, 6-2
2023-08-30vs CVTA REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrandi Lipton / Christina Eisenhard vs Helen Sommer / Nancy Stern6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebbie Day / Susan Hirano vs Holly Sprenkle / Gabriela Huebler2-6, 2-6
2023-08-16vs BRMST PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristina Eisenhard / Monica Desmoulins vs Elizabeth Wilson / Kimberley Paulsen6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDana Bickham / Susan Hirano vs Kirsty Lockhart / Kelly Walter6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrandi Lipton vs Laura Liotino6-1, 6-0
2023-08-02vs RMTC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMonica Desmoulins vs Meaghan Spiegel3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Hirano / Richelle Burnett vs Carol Hoeffler / Robin Noble6-0, 6-4
2023-07-26vs CVTA REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustine Boston / Susan Hirano vs Helen Sommer / Nancy Stern6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Christina Eisenhard
published 3.5
2.98
Amy Nichols
published 3
2.93
Monica Desmoulins
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.92
Susan Hirano
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Brandi Lipton
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Annette Wright
published 3
Barbara Stager
published 3
Dana Bickham
published 3
Debbie Day
published 3
Richelle Burnett
published
Samantha Bennett
published
Tricia Dessel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandi Lipton + Monica Desmoulins5361% games+3.5% vs expected
Susan Hirano + Brandi Lipton044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Eisenhard
18W–18L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Amy Nichols
28W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Monica Desmoulins
26W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Susan Hirano
79W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Brandi Lipton
32W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Annette Wright
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Barbara Stager
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Dana Bickham
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Debbie Day
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richelle Burnett
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Samantha Bennett
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tricia Dessel
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.