Teams

RMTC NAVY

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-06vs BCC GOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracey McCoy / Tamny Costello vs Samantha Bennett / Susan Hirano6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMeaghan Spiegel vs Amy Nichols6-3, 6-2
2023-08-30vs TTA-E PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesTamny Costello / Robin Noble vs Elizabeth Corujo / Kristen Womer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeaghan Spiegel vs Kimberly Nelson6-2, 6-2
2023-08-29vs LAC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesTamny Costello / Meaghan Spiegel vs Pam Smallwood / Shirley Bullinger5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-08-16vs CVTA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Hoeffler / Ann Hensley vs Maggie Brubaker / Gabriela Huebler2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTracey McCoy / Tamny Costello vs Jennifer Dingman / Nelly Dawallu4-6, 6-7
2023-08-09vs BRMST PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeaghan Spiegel / Tracey McCoy vs Kirsty Lockhart / Colleen Estrada6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-02vs BCC GOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTamny Costello / Tracey McCoy vs Samantha Bennett / Christina Eisenhard6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeaghan Spiegel vs Monica Desmoulins6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Meaghan Spiegel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Ann Hensley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Kelly Bassin
published
Ann Olberding
published 3
2.75
Carol Hoeffler
published 3
2.74
Tamny Costello
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Justine Allison
published
2.44
Robin Noble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justine Allison + Robin Noble3252% games+8.4% vs expected
Meaghan Spiegel + Ann Hensley7652% games+5.6% vs expected
Robin Noble + Carol Hoeffler5647% games−1.6% vs expected
Ann Hensley + Tamny Costello3447% gamesnot enough data
Meaghan Spiegel + Tamny Costello123 matchesnot enough data
Tamny Costello + Robin Noble213 matchesnot enough data
Tamny Costello + Carol Hoeffler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Meaghan Spiegel
53W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3
Ann Hensley
47W–41L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
Kelly Bassin
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Ann Olberding
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Carol Hoeffler
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Tamny Costello
44W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Justine Allison
10W–28L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
Robin Noble
15W–19L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.