Teams

TTA-E PURPLE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-06vs BRMST PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Shaver / Vivian Comas vs Kelly Walter / Melissa Rawsky3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Womer / Elizabeth Corujo vs Janine Huber / Leslie Gaiser7-6, 7-6
2023-08-30vs RMTC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Corujo / Kristen Womer vs Tamny Costello / Robin Noble6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVivian Comas / Lisa Shaver vs Justine Allison / Carol Hoeffler6-3, 6-3
2023-08-23vs BCC GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesNohemi Almaraz / Lisa Shaver vs Annette Wright / Christina Eisenhard4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Corujo vs Amy Nichols3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Brickey / Cheri Landry vs Justine Boston / Debbie Day3-6, 2-6
2023-08-16vs LAC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Womer / Elizabeth Corujo vs Milena Halek / Mary Ellen O'Rell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Brickey / Cheri Landry vs Pam Smallwood / Laura Wonnacott1-6, 2-6
2023-08-09vs CVTA REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Womer / Elizabeth Corujo vs Jennifer Dingman / Louise Fowler2-6, 2-6
2023-08-02vs BRMST PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesVivian Comas / Lisa Shaver vs Colleen Estrada / Leslie Gaiser3-6, 1-6
2023-07-26vs RMTC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesVivian Comas / Elizabeth Corujo vs Ann Olberding / Esther Brown6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Shaver vs Kelly Bassin3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Nohemi Almaraz
published 3.5
2.98
Elizabeth Corujo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.90
Kimberly Nelson
published
2.60
Lisa Shaver
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.48
Kristen Womer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.29
Allison Brickey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Shaver + Kristen Womer121151% games+10.9% vs expected
Kristen Womer + Allison Brickey41935% games−6.5% vs expected
Lisa Shaver + Allison Brickey5353% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Womer + Elizabeth Corujo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nohemi Almaraz
71W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.58
3
Elizabeth Corujo
72W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
Kimberly Nelson
25W–21L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
2.90
3
Lisa Shaver
72W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Kristen Womer
63W–86L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Allison Brickey
37W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.