Teams

Klocek/18s/2.52/PAC Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

15 players · average NTRP 2.62 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Klocek/18s/2.52/PAC Night5315921177
2Vilardo/18's/2.5/NC Night44111330222
3Wallace/18's/2.5/BC Night35101430229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ariana Petrell-thomas
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.40
Brittany Hesch
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.33
Chelsea Clement
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.33
Addie Troxclair
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Klocek
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ellie Bourgeois
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Jamie Wynn
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Jennifer Steen
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Katie DiMaria
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kay Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lauren Tagesen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lindsey Matherne
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Lisa McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lise Joffrion
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Stephanie Crow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Wynn + Lindsey Matherne8167% gamesnot enough data
Addie Troxclair + Jennifer Steen4164% gamesnot enough data
Chelsea Clement + Elizabeth Klocek213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Klocek + Kay Byrd033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ariana Petrell-thomas
12W–2L career · type D · 9 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
2.5
Brittany Hesch
6W–8L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Chelsea Clement
10W–15L career · 15 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Addie Troxclair
14W–12L career · 16 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Elizabeth Klocek
8W–18L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ellie Bourgeois
5W–6L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jamie Wynn
22W–3L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Steen
11W–14L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie DiMaria
8W–13L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kay Byrd
7W–14L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Tagesen
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Matherne
19W–7L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa McCoy
5W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lise Joffrion
11W–3L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Crow
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.