Teams

Wallace/18's/2.5/BC Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Klocek/18s/2.52/PAC Night5315921177
2Vilardo/18's/2.5/NC Night44111330222
3Wallace/18's/2.5/BC Night35101430229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.32
Adriana Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 2.5
Ashley Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Camille Pagan
published 2.5
2.24
Brianna McDaniel
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.06
Cristen Quick
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published 2.5
1.87
Cheryl Guma
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kelly Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Keri Cannizzaro
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Kristen Muller Clinton
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Michaelis
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Morgan Dore
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Phoebe Whealdon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgan Dore + Kelly Wallace2442% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Guma + Phoebe Whealdon044 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Michaelis + Cristen Quick134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Wallace + Brianna McDaniel044 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Wallace + Adriana Wilson044 matchesnot enough data
Cristen Quick + Phoebe Whealdon044 matchesnot enough data
Keri Cannizzaro + Adriana Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Cristen Quick + Adriana Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Adriana Wilson
6W–15L career · type S · 13 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Ashley Stephens
0W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Camille Pagan
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Brianna McDaniel
5W–17L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Cristen Quick
3W–12L career · type S · 12 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Cheryl Guma
2W–10L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Kelly Wallace
9W–45L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keri Cannizzaro
4W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Muller Clinton
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Michaelis
7W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Morgan Dore
8W–21L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Phoebe Whealdon
2W–19L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.