Teams

Queen City

2023 OH OV SPRING Career A55&O W Cincinnati · 2023 Spring Career A 55&O 8.0W Cincinnati

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-09-13vs BeechmontLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeanne Miller / Felicia Bourbon vs Raya Tabrah / Renuka Dewan4-6, 2-6
2023-07-20vs HarpersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMerri Beth Hebeler / Bethe Orlando vs Cheryl Krumrie / Carole Meldon6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Stephens / Carol Johnson vs Karen Buddemeyer / Nancy Sanchez4-6, 6-1, 4-3
W#3 DoublesBeverly Gates / Janet Scruby vs Carol Filomena / Joanne Andersen6-2, 6-0
2023-06-29vs LunkenWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna McClanahan / Sandra Stephens vs Meicheng Chiang / Tracy Coleman7-6, 4-2
W#2 DoublesJanet Scruby / Donna Griffor vs Susie Fegelman / Deborah Terry6-4, 6-0
2023-06-22vs HarpersWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Armentrout / Lisa Whitling vs Nancy Sanchez / Anne Lynch6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBeverly Gates / Sandra Stephens vs Carole Meldon / Julie Baldwin2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Miller / Felicia Bourbon vs Cheryl Krumrie / Joanne Andersen6-2, 6-4
2023-06-08vs LunkenWon 30
W#1 DoublesFelicia Bourbon / Jeanne Miller vs Judy Dennis / Lisa Schwartz6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Armentrout / Lisa Whitling vs Patti Baker / Karen Eberly6-7, 5-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMerri Beth Hebeler / Carol Johnson vs Tracy Coleman / Ellie Moffat6-3, 6-2
2023-06-01vs HarpersWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheri Frey / Nancy Armentrout vs Sharon McCaw / Julie Baldwin6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBethe Orlando / Donna McClanahan vs Nina Akgunduz / Kathy Guerin6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandra Stephens / Janet Scruby vs Anne Lynch / Carole Meldon6-2, 6-4
2023-05-18vs LunkenWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheri Frey / Merri Beth Hebeler vs Phyllis Mendoza / Susie Fegelman6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeanne Miller / Bethe Orlando vs Karen Eberly / Ellie Moffat6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Griffor / Carol Johnson vs Lynn Holman / Lisa Schwartz6-2, 6-1
2023-05-15vs BeechmontLost 01
L#1 DoublesFelicia Bourbon / Wendy Weil vs Beth Kushon / Patricia Rouchon-Wells3-6, 1-6
2023-05-08vs BeechmontLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Koehlke / Felicia Bourbon vs Kelly Cox-Donson / Gillian Oakenfull2-6, 2-6
2023-04-24vs BeechmontLost 01
L#1 DoublesFelicia Bourbon / Jeanne Miller vs Laurel Fritzhand / Pamela Wise5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 Spring Career A 55&O 8.0W Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Bonnie Lang
published 4
3.78
Sheri Frey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Donna Griffor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Beverly Gates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Carol Johnson
published 4
3.74
Janet Scruby
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Bethe Orlando
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Nancy Armentrout
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Sandra Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Felicia Bourbon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Donna McClanahan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Merri Beth Hebeler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeanne Miller
published
Lisa Whitling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Scruby + Felicia Bourbon6262% games+9.0% vs expected
Felicia Bourbon + Merri Beth Hebeler18854% games+3.7% vs expected
Beverly Gates + Janet Scruby14262% games+2.9% vs expected
Sheri Frey + Felicia Bourbon3446% games−2.0% vs expected
Sandra Stephens + Felicia Bourbon4646% games−3.0% vs expected
Sandra Stephens + Merri Beth Hebeler4253% games−3.1% vs expected
Sheri Frey + Nancy Armentrout6351% games−4.2% vs expected
Sandra Stephens + Janet Scruby71149% games−8.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bonnie Lang
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Sheri Frey
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Donna Griffor
44W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Beverly Gates
30W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Carol Johnson
42W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Scruby
79W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Bethe Orlando
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Nancy Armentrout
61W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.66
Sandra Stephens
84W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Felicia Bourbon
97W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Donna McClanahan
234W–146L career · 2 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Merri Beth Hebeler
87W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jeanne Miller
44W–42L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Whitling
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.