Teams

KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson

2023 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over SOUTHERN COMBO DOUBLES LEXINGTON · 6.5 ADULT WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Hiroko Nakata
published
3.44
Sarah Stykes
published
3.40
Emily Diehl
published
3.39
Janine Coy
published
3.34
Emily Pernice
published
3.30
Sarah Delahanty
published
3.29
Sarah Owens
published
3.25
3.22
Connie Ayer
published 3
3.11
Christina Bishop
published 3.5
3.10
Tanya Johnson
published
3.07
Liz Jameson
published
2.88
Natalie Avant
published
Emma Newland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Stykes + Sarah Delahanty5169% games+6.9% vs expected
Tanya Johnson + Natalie Avant0636% games−13.0% vs expected
Emily Diehl + Janine Coy224 matchesnot enough data
Janine Coy + Hiroko Nakata303 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Owens + Emily Pernice303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hiroko Nakata
37W–24L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Sarah Stykes
30W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Janine Coy
64W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
Emily Pernice
29W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Sarah Delahanty
30W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Sarah Owens
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.29
3.5
Amy Worthington Johnson
22W–28L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
3
Connie Ayer
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Christina Bishop
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Tanya Johnson
6W–34L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
Liz Jameson
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
Natalie Avant
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
Emma Newland
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.