Teams

BCST RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.95 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs BM GREEENLost 04
L#1 DoublesMaryann Barwick / Sarah McMahon vs Amanda Lessmann / Lindsey Teets4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Laura FitzSimmons6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Lange / Clara Mizenko vs Anne Casson / Laura Yetzer5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Harvey / Sharon Ehler vs Sarah Pierson / Diana Collins5-7, 5-7
2025-07-12vs LEBTC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesClara Mizenko / Amber Todd vs Philippa Biggi / Robyn Jensen4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Jennifer Flint6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Mucilli / Maryann Barwick vs Monica Panczer / Amee Auberry5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Leon / Janis Owens vs Jamie Gardner / Janee Wren4-6, 4-6
2025-06-30vs SS-LGT NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Ciacci / Clara Mizenko vs Jenna Sellers / Marleen Zakovich6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Mucilli / Judith Wallach vs Megan Chesnutt / Joanne Baginski6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Ehler / Janis Owens vs Jana GENDRON / Tracy Corbett0-6, 0-6
2025-06-23vs KC-CC SILVERLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmber Todd / Sarah McMahon vs Allison Coquet / Amy Murphy2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesClara Mizenko vs Gina Merrill1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaryann Barwick / Mary Mucilli vs Kathy Owens / VIRGINIA WANG2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Leon / Janis Owens vs Robin Woelfel / Lori Himmel6-7, 6-7
2025-06-16vs CCC PURPLELost 13
W#1 DoublesClara Mizenko / Kimberly Lange vs Josephine Huelskamp / Lauren Sykes2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Kelly Henrichs6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah McMahon / Sharon Ehler vs Juli Furtek / Jailyn Volok3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Leon / Amber Todd vs Carla Beveridge / Amy Leonard2-6, 3-6
2025-06-09vs KC-CC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesMary Mucilli / Maryann Barwick vs Zenta Pakulis / Lay Chan2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSarah McMahon vs Sheryl Larsen3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Lange / Sharon Ehler vs Ana Jansen / Leslie Hull2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanis Owens / Michelle Harvey vs Christa Williams / Susan Pine6-7, 2-6
2025-06-02vs GR NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesMaryann Barwick / Kimberly Lange vs Sydney Green / Leah Niepraschk1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Carrie Hantge7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBeth Leon / Sharon Ehler vs Elizabeth Hahn / Ally MacDougall6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJanis Owens / Amber Todd vs Audrey Nash / Ashley Busch3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Meghan Ciacci
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.61
Clara Mizenko
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.61
Mary Mucilli
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Amber Todd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Beth Leon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Kimberly Lange
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Maryann Barwick
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.44
Judith Wallach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Janis Owens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.28
Sharon Ehler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Michelle Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah McMahon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Mucilli + Judith Wallach3645% games+0.3% vs expected
Beth Leon + Janis Owens4847% games−3.6% vs expected
Mary Mucilli + Maryann Barwick82842% games−3.6% vs expected
Kimberly Lange + Clara Mizenko234541% games−5.1% vs expected
Michelle Harvey + Judith Wallach0735% games−6.6% vs expected
Sharon Ehler + Janis Owens4940% games−12.9% vs expected
Beth Leon + Maryann Barwick31144% games−13.2% vs expected
Beth Leon + Sharon Ehler21138% games−13.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Meghan Ciacci
72W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Clara Mizenko
47W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Mary Mucilli
26W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Amber Todd
5W–17L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Beth Leon
18W–60L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Kimberly Lange
38W–96L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.48
3
Maryann Barwick
27W–76L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Judith Wallach
34W–72L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Janis Owens
36W–62L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
2.5
Sharon Ehler
19W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Michelle Harvey
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah McMahon
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.