Teams

GR NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs KC-CC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesLeah Niepraschk / Elizabeth Hahn vs Stephanie Wilson / Erin Mason7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAbby Letourneau vs Sheryl Larsen0-3
L#2 DoublesJera Sturgell / Ally MacDougall vs Zenta Pakulis / Lay Chan7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKari Taylor / Audrey Nash vs Sarah Bush / Erin Stampa2-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs CCC PURPLESplit 22
W#1 DoublesAbby Letourneau / Carrie Hantge vs Jailyn Volok / Tig Ogdon6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSydney Green vs Kelly Henrichs6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJera Sturgell / Elizabeth Hahn vs Terri Slekes / Ashley Ruger6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAudrey Nash / Kari Taylor vs Liz Miller / Amy Leonard2-6, 4-6
2025-06-30vs BM GREEENWon 31
W#1 DoublesAbby Letourneau / Sydney Green vs Abby McFerron / Lindsey Teets6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCarrie Hantge vs Kerry Hudson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeah Niepraschk / Jera Sturgell vs Amanda Lessmann / Diana Collins6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAudrey Nash / Ally MacDougall vs Laura Yetzer / Anne Casson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-23vs LEBTC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesSydney Green / Leah Niepraschk vs Amee Auberry / Lisa Garbin6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCarrie Hantge vs Janee Wren6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJera Sturgell / Elizabeth Hahn vs Monica Panczer / Jamie Gardner2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAudrey Nash / Kari Taylor vs Leann Koontz / Philippa Biggi2-6, 4-6
2025-06-16vs SS-LGT NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesAbby Letourneau / Carrie Hantge vs Jana GENDRON / Clara Lee7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLeah Niepraschk vs Tracy Corbett3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Busch / Ally MacDougall vs Megan Chesnutt / Zhanna Jackson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJera Sturgell / Elizabeth Hahn vs Jenna Sellers / Marleen Zakovich6-2, 6-4
2025-06-09vs KC-CC SILVERWon 31
W#1 DoublesAbby Letourneau / Carrie Hantge vs Alexis Rubin / Amy Murphy6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSydney Green vs Gina Merrill6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Hahn / Ashley Busch vs Erica Smith / Allison Coquet6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKari Taylor / Ally MacDougall vs Lori Himmel / Robin Woelfel3-6, 4-6
2025-06-02vs BCST REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSydney Green / Leah Niepraschk vs Maryann Barwick / Kimberly Lange6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCarrie Hantge vs Meghan Ciacci5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Hahn / Ally MacDougall vs Beth Leon / Sharon Ehler7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAudrey Nash / Ashley Busch vs Janis Owens / Amber Todd6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Sydney Green
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.06
Abby Letourneau
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.98
Carrie Hantge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Leah Niepraschk
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.80
Ashley Busch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Ally MacDougall
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Elizabeth Hahn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.63
Jera Sturgell
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.49
Kari Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Audrey Nash
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Letourneau + Sydney Green9458% games+11.3% vs expected
Jera Sturgell + Leah Niepraschk9651% games+9.2% vs expected
Abby Letourneau + Carrie Hantge4256% games+4.8% vs expected
Jera Sturgell + Elizabeth Hahn3351% games−2.7% vs expected
Jera Sturgell + Kari Taylor2440% games−11.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Hahn + Leah Niepraschk3351% gamesnot enough data
Audrey Nash + Ally MacDougall2454% gamesnot enough data
Kari Taylor + Elizabeth Hahn134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sydney Green
21W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Abby Letourneau
47W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.06
3
Carrie Hantge
28W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Leah Niepraschk
44W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Ashley Busch
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Ally MacDougall
16W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Elizabeth Hahn
15W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Jera Sturgell
26W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Kari Taylor
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Audrey Nash
6W–19L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.