Teams

Sports Mall-Kasteler/Smith

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.5W AM

16 players · average NTRP 4.28 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Cyndi Jones6-1, 6-4
2024-07-29vs Ivory Ridge-Conrad/OwensSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarie Roberts / JaNae Smith vs Jen Langston / Katy Myers1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarissa Jackson / Robyn Scharman vs Natalie Griffin / Sarah Blake4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Janine Nesseth6-3, 4-2
2024-07-08vs Cottonwood Club-EischeidLost 02
L#1 DoublesCasey Pickett / Marie Roberts vs LIZ CARLSON / Catherine Bliss6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRegina Johnson / Marissa Jackson vs Wendy Widerburg / Heidi Gordon6-7, 4-6
2024-06-24vs Liberty Park Tennis-KempWon 20
W#1 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Jordyn Parry6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCasey Pickett / Marie Roberts vs Kathy Miller-Rees / Amy Johnson7-5, 6-0
2024-06-17vs Ivory Ridge-Conrad/OwensWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Hawley / Allison Rideout vs Shanda Stoner / Tanya Conrad6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJaNae Smith / Marie Roberts vs Christie Brightwell / Leslie Barrowes6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Lauren Hawley
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Allison Rideout
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Ashley Park
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.20
Karin Smith
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
4.14
Marissa Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Casey Pickett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.95
Jennifer Hathaway
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.94
Marie Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.91
Linda Marz
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.83
Tiffany Kasteler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Teisa Linscott
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.79
Susan Koelliker
published 4
3.76
Robyn Scharman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
JaNae Smith
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 4
3.60
Regina Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Katie Zimmerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JaNae Smith + Regina Johnson9456% games+10.1% vs expected
Teisa Linscott + Casey Pickett8162% games+8.9% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Susan Koelliker321059% games+7.2% vs expected
Ashley Park + Casey Pickett4356% games+6.9% vs expected
JaNae Smith + Susan Koelliker3358% games+3.8% vs expected
Robyn Scharman + Regina Johnson20955% games+3.1% vs expected
Regina Johnson + Marissa Jackson17457% games+2.9% vs expected
Karin Smith + Regina Johnson101252% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Hawley
121W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Allison Rideout
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Ashley Park
104W–40L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
4.22
Karin Smith
141W–69L career · 10 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Marissa Jackson
110W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Casey Pickett
184W–133L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
4.14
Jennifer Hathaway
65W–51L career · 7 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.95
Marie Roberts
49W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
4.5
Linda Marz
140W–118L career · 7 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.91
Tiffany Kasteler
167W–101L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Teisa Linscott
170W–105L career · 11 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Susan Koelliker
133W–81L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Robyn Scharman
118W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
JaNae Smith
221W–188L career · 11 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Regina Johnson
124W–102L career · 9 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Katie Zimmerman
27W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.