Teams

LA-LLW-Queen Anne 4.0M-David Mayer

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Men 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.03 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Aaron Nepomuceno
published 4.5
4.22
Bryan Hudson
published 4.5
4.15
TEVIN JENKINS
published 4.5
4.07
Casey Reich
published 4
4.00
Daniel Litvin
published 4
3.83
David Mayer
published 4
3.82
Jack Burton
published 4
3.76
Nick Garfinkle
published
3.75
Bryan Welch
published 4
Jake Breedlove
published 4
3.74
Thomas Eisenhauer
published
3.72
Braxton Sato
published 4
3.71
Jino Choi
published
3.55
Anil Punyapu
published 4
3.54
Andrew Chon
published 4
3.47
Daniel McDonald
published 4
3.43
Nigel Lizaranzu
published
3.00
Jeff Lorch
published
Peter Kwon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Burton + Jino Choi5062% games+3.0% vs expected
Nigel Lizaranzu + Nick Garfinkle123 matchesnot enough data
Braxton Sato + David Mayer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aaron Nepomuceno
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Bryan Hudson
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
TEVIN JENKINS
105W–50L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
4.15
4
Casey Reich
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
4.07
4
Daniel Litvin
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.00
4
David Mayer
106W–67L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Jack Burton
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
Nick Garfinkle
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Gonzalo Montenegro
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Bryan Welch
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jake Breedlove
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Eisenhauer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Braxton Sato
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Jino Choi
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Anil Punyapu
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Andrew Chon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Daniel McDonald
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
Nigel Lizaranzu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.43
3
Cinderella Gatcheco
49W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jeff Lorch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Kwon
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.