Teams

Kickin' Aces

2026 Corpus Christi RSPA Spring Day League · Ladies 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-24vs Drop Shot DivasWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaralyn Lopez / Meghan Mandel vs Diana Soto / Sarah de la Garza6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLauren Prewett / Ricki Barker vs Mandy Alsop / Pamela Aleman1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Newman / Jordan Anderson vs Debbie Becquet / Anne Mahaffey6-2, 6-3
2026-04-17vs High StrungWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Chang / Meghan Mandel vs Sharla Neessen / Erin Haynes6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMariannella Carlisle / Kira Bonesteel vs Ashlee Lee / Rachel Cupps6-1, 6-3
2026-03-27vs High StrungWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Chang / Meghan Mandel vs Ashlee Lee / Haylie Gabro2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKira Bonesteel / Ricki Barker vs Jordan Parker / Georgia Grainger6-4, 6-0
2026-03-20vs Baby Got BackhandWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Chang / Daralyn Lopez vs Tisha Belcher / Amy Roberts6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Nelson / Meghan Mandel vs Michelle Jordan / Elizabeth Cosgrove6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Newman / Jordan Anderson vs Kara Campbell / Hailey Paiz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-06vs Drop Shot DivasWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Chang / Meghan Mandel vs Sarah de la Garza / Diana Soto6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Nelson / Daralyn Lopez vs Lynn Schlimmer / BRENDA KOESTERS6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRicki Barker / Jordan Anderson vs Mandy Alsop / Anne Mahaffey3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-20vs Baby Got BackhandWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatherine Chang / Kira Bonesteel vs Michelle Jordan / Thais Hayum1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Nelson / Meghan Mandel vs Hailey Paiz / Elizabeth Cosgrove6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLauren Prewett / Ricki Barker vs Brooke Thorpe / Lauren Bowen6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Daralyn Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Katherine Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Mariannella Carlisle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Lauren Prewett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Meghan Mandel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Ricki Barker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Kira Bonesteel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Jordan Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Chang + Meghan Mandel303 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Prewett + Daralyn Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Prewett + Ricki Barker123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Prewett + Meghan Mandel213 matchesnot enough data
Daralyn Lopez + Meghan Mandel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daralyn Lopez
49W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
Katherine Chang
19W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Mariannella Carlisle
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Lauren Prewett
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Meghan Mandel
35W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Ricki Barker
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Kira Bonesteel
5W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Jordan Anderson
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.