Teams

High Strung

2026 Corpus Christi RSPA Spring Day League · Ladies 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-24vs Baby Got BackhandLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharla Neessen / Ashlee Lee vs Thais Hayum / Tisha Belcher2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHaylie Gabro / Sarah Brown vs Michelle Jordan / Brooke Thorpe7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJordan Parker / Erin Haynes vs Elizabeth Cosgrove / Amy Roberts2-6, 3-6
2026-04-17vs Kickin' AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesSharla Neessen / Erin Haynes vs Katherine Chang / Meghan Mandel0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAshlee Lee / Rachel Cupps vs Mariannella Carlisle / Kira Bonesteel1-6, 3-6
2026-03-27vs Kickin' AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshlee Lee / Haylie Gabro vs Katherine Chang / Meghan Mandel6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJordan Parker / Georgia Grainger vs Kira Bonesteel / Ricki Barker4-6, 0-6
2026-02-20vs Drop Shot DivasLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshlee Lee / Brett Goodman vs Pamela Aleman / Diana Soto6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Gates / Rachel Cupps vs Mandy Alsop / Debbie Becquet2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Haylie Gabro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Amber Taylor
published 3
Brett Goodman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Samantha Gates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Sharla Neessen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Ashlee Lee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.47
Tiffany Haas
published
2.41
Erin Haynes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Georgia Grainger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Rachel Cupps
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Holly Thomas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharla Neessen + Ashlee Lee134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Haylie Gabro
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amber Taylor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Brett Goodman
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Gates
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Sharla Neessen
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Ashlee Lee
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
Tiffany Haas
14W–9L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Erin Haynes
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
Georgia Grainger
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.30
Rachel Cupps
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.19
Holly Thomas
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.