Teams

Older Than Dirt

2024 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.45 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-10vs NDSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristopher Lind / Timothy Rosandick vs Craig Routson / Peter Johansen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJay Blackford / Tracy Kowallis vs Kenneth Kubosumi / Dana Platt6-0, 6-1
2024-07-08vs Over Served 55Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Lind / DOUGLAS de BURGH vs Brent Peterman / Steve Elwer7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-01vs Have FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Lind / DOUGLAS de BURGH vs Mark Thomann / ChaiHuat Chong6-2, 7-5
2024-06-26vs Old EnoughLost 01
L#1 DoublesKent Laverty / Tracy Kowallis vs Steven Garcia / Randy Howell4-6, 3-6
2024-06-24vs Balls OutWon 10
W#3 DoublesJackson Cramer / Tracy Kowallis vs Alex Tatistcheff / Tim Cowles6-3, 6-2
2024-06-17vs Over Served 55Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTracy Kowallis / Jackson Cramer vs Greg Haskell / Dave Landis2-6, 2-6
2024-06-12vs Have FunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Lind / DOUGLAS de BURGH vs Jason Lyons / ChaiHuat Chong6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnthony Saulino / Tracy Kowallis vs Dave Gopalakrishnan / Mark Thomann6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-10vs Old EnoughLost 01
L#1 DoublesDOUGLAS de BURGH / Christopher Lind vs Dit Dudley / Steven Garcia1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Old Enough9124618195
2Over Served 558222821198
3Older Than Dirt64161432254
4NDS46131739295
5Have Fun37141636257
6Balls Out01012959359

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Phil Ellis
published 3.5
3.40
Jim Baker
published 3.5
3.34
Anthony Saulino
published 3.5
3.28
James Elliott
published 3.5
3.27
DOUGLAS de BURGH
published 3.5
Christopher Lind
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Lynn Coltrin
published 3.5
3.14
Jackson Cramer
published 3.5
3.01
Kent Laverty
published 3
2.95
Jay Blackford
published 3.5
Timothy Rosandick
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Tracy Kowallis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Elliott + Jay Blackford5555% games+5.3% vs expected
Jay Blackford + Anthony Saulino61045% games+5.0% vs expected
Lynn Coltrin + James Elliott71345% games−12.5% vs expected
DOUGLAS de BURGH + Christopher Lind241852% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + Anthony Saulino10559% gamesnot enough data
Timothy Rosandick + James Elliott6452% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + DOUGLAS de BURGH5550% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Anthony Saulino6354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Phil Ellis
65W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Jim Baker
62W–55L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Anthony Saulino
112W–62L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
James Elliott
95W–93L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
DOUGLAS de BURGH
72W–45L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christopher Lind
20W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Lynn Coltrin
87W–108L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Jackson Cramer
19W–61L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Kent Laverty
30W–89L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Jay Blackford
39W–46L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Timothy Rosandick
10W–10L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Kowallis
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.