Teams

PTSA 4.5

2026 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

21 players · average NTRP 4.17 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-25vs TerminettersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesArianna Rose / Vanessa Almaraz vs Rebecca Newby / Mila Wood2-6, 2-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Gillis / Misaki Horikiri vs Bobette Wood / Jami Garver6-0, 6-0
2026-06-18vs VolleyciraptorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Gillis / Misaki Horikiri vs Dana Rosellini / Joelle Staley6-1, 6-2
2026-06-04vs TerminettersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMisaki Horikiri / Maji Daines vs Rachel Kincheloe / Rilee Moorhead1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesArianna Rose / Emily Thomas vs Jody Mallane / Shelley Ware1-6, 4-6
2026-05-28vs VolleyciraptorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesArianna Rose / Leiana Almaraz vs Tyler Tims / Delaney Canning7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Andrea Gillis
published 4.5
4.30
Leiana Almaraz
published 4.5
4.11
Arianna Rose
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Jennifer Wong
published
4.08
Maji Daines
published 4.5
4.04
Anya Sandusky
published 4
4.04
Vanessa Almaraz
published 4.5
4.00
Debbie Merritt
published 4
3.98
Adrienne Idsal
published 4
3.97
Heather Baird
published 4
3.96
Priya Kanaparti
published 4
3.91
3.85
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.84
Emily Thomas
published
3.84
Emily Tesnohlidek
published 4.5
3.80
Robyn Roby
published 4
3.78
Nicole Hancock
published 4
3.76
Ui Afualo
published 4
3.67
Alexandra Hodson
published 4
3.63
Kelly Sturdy
published 4
Misaki Horikiri
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anya Sandusky + Leslie Koppenhafer4358% games+13.3% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Vanessa Almaraz10558% games+7.6% vs expected
Leslie Koppenhafer + Debbie Merritt23959% games+5.8% vs expected
Anya Sandusky + Suzanna Murali15559% games+5.8% vs expected
Leslie Koppenhafer + Suzanna Murali13558% games+5.1% vs expected
Alexandra Hodson + Maji Daines23660% games+5.1% vs expected
Robyn Roby + Debbie Merritt7068% games+4.2% vs expected
Nicole Hancock + Robyn Roby14754% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Gillis
98W–57L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Leiana Almaraz
52W–45L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Arianna Rose
4W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
Jennifer Wong
12W–14L career · no lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
4.11
4.5
Maji Daines
145W–69L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Anya Sandusky
187W–100L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
4.5
Vanessa Almaraz
100W–93L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Debbie Merritt
205W–117L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Adrienne Idsal
43W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Heather Baird
151W–80L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Priya Kanaparti
76W–44L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Leslie Koppenhafer
233W–121L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Suzanna Murali
296W–164L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
Emily Thomas
27W–49L career · no lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
4.5
Emily Tesnohlidek
79W–79L career · no lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
4
Robyn Roby
394W–188L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Nicole Hancock
137W–105L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ui Afualo
157W–149L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Alexandra Hodson
155W–90L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Kelly Sturdy
93W–90L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Misaki Horikiri
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.