Teams

Martin STC

2024 Singles League 18&Over-NC · Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-05vs Rodgers 3.5 Singles- OxfordWon 20
W#1 SinglesDana Stout vs Shelby Kennedy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMandy Alford vs Devra Hampton6-2, 6-2
2024-12-02vs Rodgers 3.5 Singles- OxfordWon 20
W#1 SinglesMandy Alford vs Jessica Flesch3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMary-Sada Foster vs Shelby Kennedy6-4, 6-2
2024-11-24vs Rodgers 3.5 Singles- OxfordWon 20
W#1 SinglesMandy Alford vs Bailey Rodgers6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDana Stout vs Celia Wood7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-17vs Rodgers 3.5 Singles- OxfordWon 20
W#2 SinglesDana Stout vs Rachel Rainey6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMandy Alford vs Celia Wood6-1, 7-5
2024-11-12vs Rodgers 3.5 Singles- OxfordSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMandy Alford vs Celia Wood6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMary-Sada Foster vs Bailey Rodgers0-6, 1-6
2024-11-07vs Rodgers 3.5 Singles- OxfordSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMandy Alford vs Devra Hampton6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesTammy Smalley vs Bailey Rodgers3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Martin STC6015310113
2Rodgers 3.5 Singles- Oxford0631530183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Cristi Ross
published 3.5
3.33
Mandy Alford
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 44% · published
3.29
Tina Schneiderman
published
3.11
Dana Stout
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Tammy Smalley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Mary-Sada Foster
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Stout + Tina Schneiderman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cristi Ross
42W–52L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
Mandy Alford
72W–57L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Tina Schneiderman
49W–41L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Dana Stout
34W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Tammy Smalley
79W–56L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Mary-Sada Foster
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.