Teams

Rodgers 3.5 Singles- Oxford

2024 Singles League 18&Over-NC · Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-05vs Martin STCLost 02
L#1 SinglesShelby Kennedy vs Dana Stout3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDevra Hampton vs Mandy Alford2-6, 2-6
2024-12-02vs Martin STCLost 02
L#1 SinglesJessica Flesch vs Mandy Alford6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShelby Kennedy vs Mary-Sada Foster4-6, 2-6
2024-11-24vs Martin STCLost 02
L#1 SinglesBailey Rodgers vs Mandy Alford3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCelia Wood vs Dana Stout5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-11-17vs Martin STCLost 03
L#1 SinglesBailey Rodgers vs Penny Martin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRachel Rainey vs Dana Stout3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesCelia Wood vs Mandy Alford1-6, 5-7
2024-11-12vs Martin STCLost 12
L#1 SinglesCelia Wood vs Mandy Alford0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesShelby Toole vs Penny Martin0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesBailey Rodgers vs Mary-Sada Foster6-0, 6-1
2024-11-07vs Martin STCLost 12
L#1 SinglesRachel Rainey vs Penny Martin2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDevra Hampton vs Mandy Alford1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBailey Rodgers vs Tammy Smalley6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Jessica Flesch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Shelby Kennedy
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.99
Celia Wood
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Devra Hampton
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.93
Bailey Rodgers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Lindsey Garner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.69
Rachel Rainey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.46
Shelby Toole
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Rainey + Shelby Toole123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Flesch
28W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Shelby Kennedy
34W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.01
3.5
Celia Wood
17W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Devra Hampton
31W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Bailey Rodgers
17W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lindsey Garner
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
0%5%95%
2.74
Rachel Rainey
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Shelby Toole
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
0%60%40%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.