Teams

CROW CANYON CC 40AW3.5A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Pia Moore
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Shelley Lober
published
3.23
Emily Amott
published
3.23
Leda Lim
published
3.22
Lea McSweeney
published
3.19
Dana Kruger
published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Henderson
published
3.15
Cindy Raykiewicz
published 3.5
3.08
Romeda Arsanjani
published
3.07
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
3.00
Gayle Millington
published
2.80
Karen Schumann
published
2.48
Cami Bebarta
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lea McSweeney + Debbie Baker3351% games−0.8% vs expected
Lea McSweeney + Shelley Lober134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Henderson + Cindy Raykiewicz224 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Raykiewicz + Dana Kruger134 matchesnot enough data
Lea McSweeney + Emily Amott213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Kruger + Emily Amott033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pia Moore
67W–40L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Shelley Lober
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Emily Amott
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Leda Lim
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Lea McSweeney
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Dana Kruger
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Lisa Henderson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Cindy Raykiewicz
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Romeda Arsanjani
9W–17L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Gayle Millington
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Karen Schumann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.80
3
Cami Bebarta
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.