Teams

Olympic 1

2024 FALL A55&O · FALL Adult 55&Over Women 8.0 Wednesday

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-12-06vs The Players ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jarrett / Eva Nourse vs Tammy Smith / Suzanne Shealy4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Ruoff / EMILY SAALMAN vs Judy Barbao / Kris Susa2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLeanna Cempre / Lori Brown vs Stacey Royer / Gina Urwin2-6, 1-6
2023-11-15vs Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Pisciotta / Michelle Jarrett vs Susan Sugar / Barbara Sinclair6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEMILY SAALMAN / Kathy Ruoff vs Julie Wiltberger / Shelley Finley4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Brown / Leanna Cempre vs Diane Crawford / Linda Ranck6-3, 6-3
2023-11-08vs Olympic 2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jarrett / Laura Pisciotta vs Anne Hunnell / Lois Dosky3-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEMILY SAALMAN / Leanna Cempre vs Jane Heath / Martha Pfeifer4-6, 3-4
W#3 DoublesLori Brown / Mary Jane Hamilton vs Linda Guyton / Sarah Lukach6-0, 6-1
2023-11-01vs The Players ClubWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Pisciotta / Michelle Jarrett vs Kris Susa / Judy Barbao6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLori Brown / Mary Jane Hamilton vs Janet Disbennett / Gina Urwin6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEMILY SAALMAN / Kathy Ruoff vs Jackie Calnon / Yuko Seitz6-2, 6-3
2023-10-25vs Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Pisciotta / Michelle Jarrett vs Pat Rothney / Barbara Sinclair6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Brown / Mary Jane Hamilton vs Linda Ranck / Beth Lecorgne6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEMILY SAALMAN / Leanna Cempre vs Shelley Finley / Cathy Presper3-6, 3-5
2023-10-18vs Olympic 2Won 21
L#1 DoublesEva Nourse / Michelle Jarrett vs Anne Hunnell / Jane Heath6-7, 5-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Jane Hamilton / Lori Brown vs Mandi Grohoske / Barbara Koch6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Ruoff / EMILY SAALMAN vs Martha Pfeifer / Nancy Lucas6-1, 6-3
2023-10-11vs The Players ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Jarrett / Laura Pisciotta vs Kris Susa / Judy Barbao6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBarbara Wiese / Mary Jane Hamilton vs Carole Myser / Meg Perez3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Ruoff / EMILY SAALMAN vs Jonalee Roahrig / Gina Urwin6-7, 3-1, 1-0
2023-10-04vs Racquet ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesEva Nourse / Michelle Jarrett vs Susan Sugar / Barbara Sinclair6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Hamilton / Lori Brown vs Cathy Presper / Susan Snyder7-6, 1-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeanna Cempre / Kathy Ruoff vs Beth Lecorgne / Mary McGuff2-6, 6-7
2023-09-27vs Olympic 2Won 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Pisciotta / Michelle Jarrett vs Kathleen Kinnard / Linda Guyton6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Brown / Mary Jane Hamilton vs Lois Dosky / Anne Hunnell3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEMILY SAALMAN / Kathy Ruoff vs Deborah Ellis / Barbara Koch6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL Adult 55&Over Women 8.0 Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Michelle Jarrett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
EMILY SAALMAN
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.48
Barbara Wiese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Eva Nourse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Ruoff
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Laura Pisciotta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leanna Cempre
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Jane Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

EMILY SAALMAN + Kathy Ruoff141053% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Jarrett + Eva Nourse4750% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Jarrett + Laura Pisciotta8163% gamesnot enough data
Leanna Cempre + Kathy Ruoff4447% gamesnot enough data
Leanna Cempre + Barbara Wiese3345% gamesnot enough data
EMILY SAALMAN + Barbara Wiese3357% gamesnot enough data
Leanna Cempre + EMILY SAALMAN134 matchesnot enough data
Leanna Cempre + Michelle Jarrett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Jarrett
61W–38L career · 9 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
EMILY SAALMAN
144W–97L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
3.5
Barbara Wiese
58W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
3.48
Eva Nourse
11W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Ruoff
35W–38L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Pisciotta
12W–15L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leanna Cempre
14W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Jane Hamilton
38W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.