Teams

ETC: Enfield Slammers:Megas

2024 WMA Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men 1

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-01-21vs BAY:Amherst Gents:RocheLost 13
L#1 DoublesLawrence Eagan / David Chassanoff vs Chris Ferriter / Ben Lewis0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRussell Tencer vs Ho-Sung Kim1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKent Griffiths / Russell Moore vs Patrick Roche / Christopher Seibert6-3, 6-7, 4-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Freedman / T John Megas vs Richard Getler / Cameron Wiley0-6, 1-6
2023-12-10vs BAY:Amherst Gents:RocheSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDaniel Torres / Michael Shields vs Christopher Seibert / Patrick Roche2-6, 6-0, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRussell Tencer vs Dave Butts6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJonathan Han / Jay Kimmel vs Benjamin Thompson / Niels Christiansen6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSteven Danishevsky / Hans Doup vs Jason Hopkins / Ken Tereso7-5, 6-1
2023-11-12vs BAY:Amherst Gents:RocheWon 31
W#1 DoublesSam Ho / Russell Moore vs Christopher Seibert / Ken Tereso6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJonathan Orenstein vs Dave Butts3-6, 7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJonathan Han / Jay Kimmel vs Richard Getler / Niels Christiansen3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLawrence Eagan / Michael Shields vs Jason Hopkins / Peter Ghitman6-2, 6-3
2023-10-15vs BAY:Amherst Gents:RocheSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJonathan Orenstein / David Chassanoff vs Ben Lewis / Christopher Seibert2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRussell Tencer vs Patrick Roche6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKent Griffiths / Russell Moore vs Ken Tereso / Cameron Wiley6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesT John Megas / Sam Ho vs Benjamin Thompson / Peter Ghitman2-6, 6-3, 4-3
2023-09-30vs BAY:Amherst Gents:RocheWon 31
L#1 DoublesMichael Freedman / Hans Doup vs Chris Ferriter / Ben Lewis3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRussell Tencer vs Patrick Roche6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKent Griffiths / Eric Ceccotti vs Richard Getler / Cameron Wiley6-1, 1-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Torres / Steven Danishevsky vs Ho-Sung Kim / Niels Christiansen7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC: Enfield Slammers:Megas0511921183
2BAY:Amherst Gents:Roche0591124198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Russell Tencer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.00
Michael Freedman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Jonathan Orenstein
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Kent Griffiths
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Hans Doup
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
David Chassanoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric Ceccotti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Harvey Hoffman
published
Jay Kimmel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Han
published
Lawrence Eagan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Shields
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rolly Ciocca
published
Russell Moore
published
Sam Ho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Steven Danishevsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
T John Megas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Ceccotti + Kent Griffiths404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Russell Tencer
36W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
4.07
Michael Freedman
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
Jonathan Orenstein
120W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Kent Griffiths
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Hans Doup
26W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
David Chassanoff
24W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Eric Ceccotti
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Harvey Hoffman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jay Kimmel
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jonathan Han
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lawrence Eagan
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Shields
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rolly Ciocca
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Russell Moore
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sam Ho
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Danishevsky
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
T John Megas
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.