Teams

BAY:Amherst Gents:Roche

2024 WMA Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men 1

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-01-21vs ETC: Enfield Slammers:MegasWon 31
W#1 DoublesChris Ferriter / Ben Lewis vs Lawrence Eagan / David Chassanoff6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHo-Sung Kim vs Russell Tencer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPatrick Roche / Christopher Seibert vs Kent Griffiths / Russell Moore3-6, 7-6, 1-4
W#3 DoublesRichard Getler / Cameron Wiley vs Michael Freedman / T John Megas6-0, 6-1
2023-12-10vs ETC: Enfield Slammers:MegasSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChristopher Seibert / Patrick Roche vs Daniel Torres / Michael Shields6-2, 0-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDave Butts vs Russell Tencer3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Thompson / Niels Christiansen vs Jonathan Han / Jay Kimmel7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJason Hopkins / Ken Tereso vs Steven Danishevsky / Hans Doup5-7, 1-6
2023-11-12vs ETC: Enfield Slammers:MegasLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristopher Seibert / Ken Tereso vs Sam Ho / Russell Moore3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDave Butts vs Jonathan Orenstein6-3, 5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Getler / Niels Christiansen vs Jonathan Han / Jay Kimmel6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJason Hopkins / Peter Ghitman vs Lawrence Eagan / Michael Shields2-6, 3-6
2023-10-15vs ETC: Enfield Slammers:MegasSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBen Lewis / Christopher Seibert vs Jonathan Orenstein / David Chassanoff6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPatrick Roche vs Russell Tencer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKen Tereso / Cameron Wiley vs Kent Griffiths / Russell Moore2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Thompson / Peter Ghitman vs T John Megas / Sam Ho2-6, 6-3, 4-3
2023-09-30vs ETC: Enfield Slammers:MegasLost 13
W#1 DoublesChris Ferriter / Ben Lewis vs Michael Freedman / Hans Doup6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPatrick Roche vs Russell Tencer2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Getler / Cameron Wiley vs Kent Griffiths / Eric Ceccotti1-6, 6-1, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHo-Sung Kim / Niels Christiansen vs Daniel Torres / Steven Danishevsky6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC: Enfield Slammers:Megas0511921183
2BAY:Amherst Gents:Roche0591124198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Ben Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Cameron Wiley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Dave Butts
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Patrick Roche
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Chris Ferriter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Christopher Seibert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Jason Hopkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Richard Getler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Peter Ghitman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ho-Sung Kim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Ken Tereso
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Niels Christiansen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Ferriter + Christopher Seibert3447% games+5.8% vs expected
Patrick Roche + Ben Lewis5257% games+4.9% vs expected
Chris Ferriter + Ben Lewis19757% games+4.6% vs expected
Christopher Seibert + Niels Christiansen9362% gamesnot enough data
Richard Getler + Niels Christiansen5166% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Roche + Chris Ferriter3252% gamesnot enough data
Peter Ghitman + Richard Getler3257% gamesnot enough data
Benjamin Thompson + Richard Getler404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Lewis
98W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Cameron Wiley
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Dave Butts
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
Patrick Roche
66W–75L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Benjamin Thompson
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Chris Ferriter
150W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Christopher Seibert
47W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Jason Hopkins
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Richard Getler
126W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
Peter Ghitman
79W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Ho-Sung Kim
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ken Tereso
16W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Niels Christiansen
27W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.