Teams

Love All Around (Beerman) - M. Bull

2025 Polk (NA) Casual League · 3.5 Plus

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-15Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesRobin Sussingham / Karen Bateman vs Lauren Mason / Leilani Guinn1-6, 2-6
L#4 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Hayley Hurd vs Karola Cordero / Cynthia Nettles1-6, 3-6
2025-09-24vs Amazons - M. TrujilloLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Aroma Taicher vs Maria Ramka / Gloria Murphy4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-10Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Laurie Grieger vs Lauren Mason / Meghan Savant1-6, 0-6
2025-09-03vs LCC- Mullins/WidickLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Aroma Taicher vs Joan Baldava / Kerrie Hall0-6, 1-6
2025-08-27Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Aroma Taicher vs Jennifer Rogers / Nathaly Arredondo2-6, 2-6
2025-08-20vs Amazons - M. TrujilloWon 10
W#4 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Laurie Grieger vs Gwen Allen / Gloria Murphy6-4, 6-4
2025-08-13vs Winter Haven City - J. EdwardsWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Aroma Taicher vs Terree Meyers / Julia Menendez6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Plus have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Ana Gillespie
usually #1 Female Doubles 46%, also #3 Female Doubles 27% · published 4
3.34
Tessie Beltran
usually #1 Female Doubles 36%, also #5 Female Doubles 21% · published
3.27
Janese Dennis
usually #1 Female Doubles 87%, also #3 Female Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.19
Anna Previte
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.15
Melanie Langley
published
3.10
Hayley Hurd
published 3.5
3.08
Robin Sussingham
usually #2 Female Doubles 30%, also #1 Female Doubles 30% · published
3.03
Melissa Darch
usually #2 Female Doubles 54%, also #1 Female Doubles 31% · published 3.5
2.95
Ginger Davis
usually #5 Female Doubles 33%, also #4 Female Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.92
Karen Hogg
usually #2 Female Doubles 36%, also #4 Female Doubles 27% · published 3
2.82
Karen Bateman
usually #3 Female Doubles 71%, also #4 Female Doubles 29% · published
2.81
Laurie Grieger
published
2.73
Leisa Jordan
published
2.63
Susan White
published
Margaret Huggins
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published
Valerie Morrow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Darch + Anna Previte211750% games+9.1% vs expected
Tessie Beltran + Karen Hogg4751% games+8.9% vs expected
Ginger Davis + Anna Previte17757% games+7.3% vs expected
Tessie Beltran + Anna Previte8357% games+6.6% vs expected
Robin Sussingham + Janese Dennis5355% games−0.1% vs expected
Melissa Darch + Janese Dennis71149% games−2.8% vs expected
Janese Dennis + Anna Previte4448% games−2.9% vs expected
Karen Bateman + Tessie Beltran4543% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Gillespie
24W–48L career · 11 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Tessie Beltran
67W–80L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Janese Dennis
121W–115L career · 15 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anna Previte
99W–73L career · 16 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Melanie Langley
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Hayley Hurd
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Robin Sussingham
21W–37L career · 10 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Melissa Darch
63W–77L career · 13 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Ginger Davis
113W–97L career · 8 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Karen Hogg
84W–99L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Karen Bateman
39W–65L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Laurie Grieger
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Leisa Jordan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Susan White
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
Margaret Huggins
7W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Morrow
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.