Teams

GEPTA/Adult 2.5W/Scott/CCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lindner / Lindsey Yancey vs Nayely Ruiz / Suleima Villa4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-27Split 11
L#1 DoublesAlison Leben / Marisol Mcneil vs Cecilia Delgado / Diana M Perez2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStefanie Welsch / PAMELA ZARAGOZA vs Clara C Esparza / Gabriela Marquez6-4, 6-4
2025-04-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsey Yancey / Maggie Lindner vs Cristina Gonzalez / Mara Talamantes0-6, 0-6
2025-04-06vs GEPTA/Adult 2.5W/Miranda/EPTC#1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStefanie Welsch / Marisol Mcneil vs Paola Rojas Miranda / Melina Salazar3-6, 4-6
2025-03-23Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaggie Lindner / Lindsey Yancey vs Sarah Palacios / Andrea Faugstad5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStefanie Welsch / PAMELA ZARAGOZA vs Kimberly Garcia / Daniela Szostek0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38
Alison Leben
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 2.5
1.87
AYLEEN PACE
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 2.5
Lexi Torres
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Lindsey Yancey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maggie Lindner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Marisela Scott
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Marisol Mcneil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Monica Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
PAMELA ZARAGOZA
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stefanie Welsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisela Scott + Alison Leben6457% gamesnot enough data
Monica Ramirez + Alison Leben5455% gamesnot enough data
Monica Ramirez + AYLEEN PACE2633% gamesnot enough data
Lindsey Yancey + Maggie Lindner2444% gamesnot enough data
Lexi Torres + Alison Leben4152% gamesnot enough data
Monica Ramirez + Maggie Lindner213 matchesnot enough data
Monica Ramirez + Stefanie Welsch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alison Leben
33W–31L career · 29 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
AYLEEN PACE
4W–38L career · 13 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Lexi Torres
7W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Yancey
6W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maggie Lindner
13W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisela Scott
18W–28L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisol Mcneil
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Ramirez
17W–63L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
PAMELA ZARAGOZA
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stefanie Welsch
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.